USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

pro med instruments GmbH

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 22 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, pro ranks #13,629 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 22 patents across 8 technology areas.

#13,629
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
49th percentile
by Innovation Score (34.8/100)
15.4
avg claims per patent
+13%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R13629 · Foreign Corporation #13,629 · 22 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 22 grants
  • MID-PACK #13,629/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH dacadoo
  • CPC-NARROW A61B · 8 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 34.8/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 15.4 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-UP +13% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: dacadoo ag (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How pro’s 34.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around pro

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows pro's Innovation Score is 34.8/100 (49th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for pro?

Each dot is one of pro’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). pro’s own 15.4 claims/patent is at or below the 18.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

pro vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 20.52121.52222.5 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Zhuhai Advanced Chip Carriers & Electronic Substrate Solutions Technologies Co. Ltd. - 22, 23.09Zhuhai Advanced C…dacadoo ag - 22, 9.23dacadooeSilicon Corporation - 22, 18.18esilicono9 Solutions, Inc. - 22, 21.23o9 SolutionsÖHLINS Racing AB - 22, 14.18ÖHlins Racing AB1304342 Alberta Ltd. - 21, 12.621304342 Alberta2seventy bio, Inc. - 21, 22.952seventy bio3D Glass Solutions, Inc. - 21, 19.813D Glass Solutionspro med instruments GmbH - 22, 15.41pro med instrumen…
pro vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where pro's grants concentrate

pro med instruments GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 95.5% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, pro sits between Zhuhai Advanced Chip Carriers & Electronic Substrate Solutions Technologies Co. Ltd. and 3D Glass Solutions, Inc..

pro's three-year grant acceleration

pro med instruments GmbH shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 7 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at pro's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows pro holds 22 patents at rank #13,813, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near pro

By rank, the assignees closest to #13,813 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in pro's primary technology class.

pro's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

35 49th percentile higher than 49% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0123456 2015201620172019202020212022202320242025 5
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
pro med instruments GmbH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 2 9.1%
2016 1 4.5%
2017 2 9.1%
2019 3 13.6%
2020 2 9.1%
2021 2 9.1%
2022 1 4.5%
2023 1 4.5%
2024 3 13.6%
2025partial year 5 22.7%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

pro med instruments GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • pro med instruments GmbH's lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 95.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
  • Ranked #13,629 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare pro med instruments GmbH against Zhuhai Advanced Chip Carriers & Electronic Substrate Solutions Technologies Co. Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 34.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.