Where does PRO MAG MFG., Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), PRO MAG MFG., Inc. ranks #29,833 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does PRO MAG MFG., Inc. hold?

PRO MAG MFG., Inc. holds 9 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2020, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is PRO MAG MFG., Inc.'s Innovation Score?

PRO MAG MFG., Inc. has an Innovation Score of 25.5 out of 100 (17th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is PRO MAG MFG., Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

PRO MAG MFG., Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -87% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for PRO MAG MFG., Inc.'s patents?

PRO MAG MFG., Inc.'s patents average 19.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the PRO MAG MFG., Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

PRO MAG MFG., Inc.

Q: What technology areas does PRO MAG MFG., Inc. focus on?

PRO MAG MFG., Inc.'s top technology area is F41A (Functional Features OR Details Common TO Both Smallarms AND Ordnance, e.g. CANNONS; Mountings FOR Smallarms OR Ordnance) with 8 patents, ranking #75 of 374 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F41A (Functional Features OR Details Common TO Both Smallarms AND Ordnance, e.g. CANNONS; Mountings FOR Smallarms OR Ordnance).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, PRO ranks #29,833 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 3 technology areas.

#29,833
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 17th percentile
by Innovation Score (25.5/100): 19.0
avg claims per patent: -87%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R29833 · US Corporation #29,833 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
MID-PACK #29,833/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Prime Forming &…
CPC-NARROW F41A · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 25.5/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -87% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Prime Forming & Construction Supplies, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How PRO’s 25.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.0 pts (31%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 6.1 pts (24%) Claim depth 11.4 pts (45%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
CSG Systems · near

26
Paragon & Kgaa · near

25
PRO MAG MFG · this assignee

25
PUC Perfect Union · near

25
Flos S P A · near

25
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows PRO's Innovation Score is 25.5/100 (17th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for PRO?

Each dot is one of PRO’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). PRO’s own 19.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

PRO vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where PRO's grants concentrate

PRO MAG MFG., Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 88.9% of grants classified under F41A (Functional Features OR Details Common TO Both Smallarms AND Ordnance, e.g. CANNONS; Mountings FOR Smallarms OR Ordnance). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, PRO sits between Prime Forming & Construction Supplies, Inc. and Product Specialties Inc..

Prime Forming & C…

9
Primesource Build…

9
Princo Middle Eas…

9
Privilege Wireless

9
Proceq

9
Procos S P A

9
Prodose

9
Product Specialti…

9
PRO MAG MFG ◀

9

What this shows PRO holds 9 patents at rank #29,755, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near PRO

By rank, the assignees closest to #29,755 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F41A (Functional Features OR Details Common TO Both Smallarms A…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in PRO's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for PRO, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In F41A (Functional Features OR Details Common TO Both Smallarms A…), PRO ranks #75 of 374 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (25 here).

PUC Perfect Union Co., Ltd. 25 Paragon GMBH & Co. Kgaa 25 Flos S.P.A. 25 CSG Systems, Inc. 26

PRO's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

25 17th percentile higher than 17% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

PRO MAG MFG., Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	3	33.3%
2017	2	22.2%
2018	2	22.2%
2019	1	11.1%
2020	1	11.1%

Which technologies does PRO MAG MFG., Inc. patent most?

F41A - Functional Features OR Details Common TO Both Smallarms AND Ordnance, e.g. CANNONS; Mountings FOR Smallarms OR Ordnance 8

F41C - Smallarms, e.g. Pistols, Rifles ; Accessories Therefor 3

F42B - Explosive Charges, e.g. FOR Blasting, Fireworks, Ammunition 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

PRO MAG MFG., Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

PRO MAG MFG., Inc.'s lead technology class is F41A (Functional Features OR Details Common TO Both Smallarms AND Ordnance, e.g. CANNONS; Mountings FOR Smallarms OR Ordnance), 88.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F41A
Ranked #29,833 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare PRO MAG MFG., Inc. against Prime Forming & Construction Supplies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 25.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.