Pinger Technologies, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2016. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Pinger ranks #42,348 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #42,348
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 12th percentile
- by Innovation Score (23.1/100)
- 17.2
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R42348 · US Corporation #42,348 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #42,348/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH PI R&D
- CPC-NARROW G09F · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 23.1/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: PI R&D Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Pinger’s 23.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Pinger
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Pinger · this assignee 23
Pinger · this assignee
23 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Pinger's Innovation Score is 23.1/100 (12th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Pinger?
Each dot is one of Pinger’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Pinger’s own 17.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Pinger's grants concentrate
Pinger Technologies, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2015. By volume, Pinger sits between PI R&D Co., Ltd. and Planmed OY.
Who files at Pinger's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- PI R&D
PI R&D Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Picometrix
Picometrix, LLC
6 patents
- Piet Scheurs Hold…
Piet Scheurs Holding B.V.
6 patents
- Pineapple Contrac…
Pineapple Contracts Unlimited
6 patents
- Piovan S P A
Piovan S.P.A.
6 patents
- Pivotal Systems
Pivotal Systems Corporation
6 patents
- PJ Factory
PJ Factory Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Planmed OY
Planmed OY
6 patents
- Pinger ◀
Pinger Technologies, Inc.
6 patents
What this shows Pinger holds 6 patents at rank #42,246, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Pinger
By rank, the assignees closest to #42,246 in granted patent volume.
- PI R&D Co., Ltd. #42,242 · 6 patents
- Picometrix, LLC #42,243 · 6 patents
- Piet Scheurs Holding B.V. #42,244 · 6 patents
- Pineapple Contracts Unlimited #42,245 · 6 patents
- Piovan S.P.A. #42,247 · 6 patents
- Pivotal Systems Corporation #42,248 · 6 patents
- PJ Factory Co., Ltd. #42,249 · 6 patents
- Planmed OY #42,250 · 6 patents
Leaders in G09F (Displaying)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Pinger's primary technology class.
- BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. 621 in class
- Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha 467 in class
- Japan Display Inc. 305 in class
- LG Display Co., Ltd. 268 in class
- Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. 249 in class
- Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology Co., Ltd. 183 in class
- Chengdu BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. 152 in class
- Sakai Display Products Corporation 97 in class
Pinger's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 12th percentile higher than 12% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2016 | 4 | 66.7% |
Which technologies does Pinger Technologies, Inc. patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Pinger Technologies, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Pinger Technologies, Inc.'s lead technology class is G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G09F
- Ranked #42,348 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Pinger Technologies, Inc. against PI R&D Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 23.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.