pewag austria GmbH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B66C (CRANES; Load-engaging Elements OR Devices FOR Cranes, Capstans, Winches, OR Tackles).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, pewag ranks #27,110 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #27,110
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 11th percentile
- by Innovation Score (23.1/100)
- 8.0
- avg claims per patent
- -20%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R27110 · Foreign Corporation #27,110 · 10 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
- MID-PACK #27,110/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH invoX Pharma
- CPC-NARROW B66C · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 23.1/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 8.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DOWN -20% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: invoX Pharma Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How pewag’s 23.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around pewag
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- pewag austria · this assignee 23
pewag austria · this assignee
23 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows pewag's Innovation Score is 23.1/100 (11th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for pewag?
Each dot is one of pewag’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). pewag’s own 8.0 claims/patent is at or below the 15.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where pewag's grants concentrate
pewag austria GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 70% of grants classified under B66C (CRANES; Load-engaging Elements OR Devices FOR Cranes, Capstans, Winches, OR Tackles). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, pewag sits between invoX Pharma Limited and 1010210 B.C. Ltd..
Who files at pewag's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- invox Pharma
invoX Pharma Limited
10 patents
- jsonar
jSonar, Inc.
10 patents
- ncino
nCino, Inc.
10 patents
- ndd Medizintechnik
ndd Medizintechnik AG
10 patents
- thyssenkrupp Poly…
thyssenkrupp Polysius GmbH
10 patents
- vida Therapeutics
viDA Therapeutics Inc.
10 patents
- pewag austria ◀
pewag austria GmbH
10 patents
- 1004335 Ontario
1004335 Ontario Inc.
9 patents
- 1010210 B C
1010210 B.C. Ltd.
9 patents
What this shows pewag holds 10 patents at rank #27,924, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near pewag
By rank, the assignees closest to #27,924 in granted patent volume.
- invoX Pharma Limited #27,920 · 10 patents
- jSonar, Inc. #27,921 · 10 patents
- nCino, Inc. #27,922 · 10 patents
- ndd Medizintechnik AG #27,923 · 10 patents
- thyssenkrupp Polysius GmbH #27,925 · 10 patents
- viDA Therapeutics Inc. #27,926 · 10 patents
- 1004335 Ontario Inc. #27,927 · 9 patents
- 1010210 B.C. Ltd. #27,928 · 9 patents
Leaders in B66C (Cranes)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in pewag's primary technology class.
- Tadano Ltd. 144 in class
- Konecranes Global Corporation 90 in class
- Liebherr-werk Ehingen GMBH 88 in class
- Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd 81 in class
- Manitowoc Crane Companies, LLC 60 in class
- Liebherr-werk Biberach GMBH 59 in class
- Manitowoc Crane Group France 48 in class
- Itrec B.V. 46 in class
pewag's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 11th percentile higher than 11% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2016 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2021 | 4 | 40.0% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 10.0% |
Which technologies does pewag austria GmbH patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
pewag austria GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- pewag austria GmbH's lead technology class is B66C (CRANES; Load-engaging Elements OR Devices FOR Cranes, Capstans, Winches, OR Tackles), 70% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B66C
- Ranked #27,110 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare pewag austria GmbH against invoX Pharma Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 23.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.