Perfect Trac Opco, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Perfect ranks #42,291 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #42,291
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 12th percentile
- by Innovation Score (23.3/100)
- 13.7
- avg claims per patent
- +50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R42291 · US Corporation #42,291 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #42,291/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Penn Color
- CPC-NARROW Y10T · 2 areas
- INNOV-THIN 23.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Penn Color, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Perfect’s 23.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Perfect
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Perfect Trac Opco · this assignee 23
Perfect Trac Opco · this assignee
23 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Perfect's Innovation Score is 23.3/100 (12th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Perfect?
Each dot is one of Perfect’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Perfect’s own 13.7 claims/patent is at or below the 18.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Perfect's grants concentrate
Perfect Trac Opco, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, Perfect sits between Penn Color, Inc. and PerioTech, LLC.
Perfect's three-year grant acceleration
Perfect Trac Opco, LLC shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Perfect's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Penn Color
Penn Color, Inc.
6 patents
- Penny & Giles Con…
Penny & Giles Controls Limited
6 patents
- Perceptive
Perceptive Inc.
6 patents
- Perceptive Medical
Perceptive Medical Inc.
6 patents
- Perfect Union
Perfect Union Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Performance Labs…
Performance Labs Pte. Ltd.
6 patents
- Perimeter Solutio…
Perimeter Solutions LP
6 patents
- Periotech
PerioTech, LLC
6 patents
- Perfect Trac Opco ◀
Perfect Trac Opco, LLC
6 patents
What this shows Perfect holds 6 patents at rank #42,364, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Perfect
By rank, the assignees closest to #42,364 in granted patent volume.
- Penn Color, Inc. #42,360 · 6 patents
- Penny & Giles Controls Limited #42,361 · 6 patents
- Perceptive Inc. #42,362 · 6 patents
- Perceptive Medical Inc. #42,363 · 6 patents
- Perfect Union Co., Ltd. #42,365 · 6 patents
- Performance Labs Pte. Ltd. #42,366 · 6 patents
- Perimeter Solutions LP #42,367 · 6 patents
- PerioTech, LLC #42,368 · 6 patents
Leaders in Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Perfect's primary technology class.
Perfect's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 12th percentile higher than 12% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2020 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Perfect Trac Opco, LLC patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Perfect Trac Opco, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Perfect Trac Opco, LLC's lead technology class is Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore Y10T
- Ranked #42,291 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Perfect Trac Opco, LLC against Penn Color, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 23.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.