USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Perfect Company

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 26 granted patents across 18 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING).

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

Total patents granted

CPC technology areas

17.8

Avg claims per patent

+17%

5-year grant velocity

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Perfect ranks #11,767 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 26 patents across 18 technology areas.

#11,767
of 50,000 US assignees by volume: Top 44%
by Innovation Score (37.4/100): 17.8
avg claims per patent: +17%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Perfect Company has been granted 26 US utility patents between 2017 and 2024, placing Perfect Company at #11,767 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 18 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING). As a US Corporation, Perfect Company is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Perfect sits between Parabit Systems, Inc (26 patents, rank #11,768) and Profusa, Inc (26 patents, rank #11,776) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 37.4/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 14 grants, compared with 12 in the 2015–2019 window, a +17% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The US Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.

Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Perfect Company's 17.8 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 18 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.

Parabit Systems

26
Paramount Automot…

26
Parkervision

26
Pavillon Data Sys…

26
Plasser & Theurer…

26
Poynt

26
Privacy Analytics

26
Profusa

26
Perfect ◀

26

What this shows Perfect holds 26 patents at rank #11,772, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Perfect

By rank, the assignees closest to #11,772 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital DATA Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Perfect's primary technology class.

Perfect's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

37 Top 44% higher than 56% of 50,000 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Perfect Company patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	2	7.7%
2018	2	7.7%
2019	8	30.8%
2020	7	26.9%
2021	6	23.1%
2024	1	3.8%

Which technologies does Perfect Company patent most?

G06F - ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING 11

G06V - IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING 10

G06T - IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL 10

G01G - WEIGHING 9

G06Q - INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR 7

G09B - EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS 6

A45D - HAIRDRESSING OR SHAVING EQUIPMENT ; EQUIPMENT FOR COSMETICS OR COSMETIC TREATMENTS, e.g. FOR MANICURING OR PEDICURING 4

H04L - TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION 4

A47J - KITCHEN EQUIPMENT; COFFEE MILLS; SPICE MILLS; APPARATUS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES 4

A23L - FOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; PREPARATION OR TREATMENT THEREOF 4

A23V - INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO FOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND LACTIC OR PROPIONIC ACID BACTERIA USED IN FOODSTUFFS OR FOOD PREPARATION 4

G01N - INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 4

H04N - PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION 3

B01F - MIXING, e.g. DISSOLVING, EMULSIFYING OR DISPERSING 2

G08B - SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS 1

Top 15 of 18 technology areas

Grant record at a glance

Portfolio Volume 26 grants

CPC subclasses 18

Avg. claims / grant 17.8

Velocity +17%

Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#11,767

of 50,000 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

37.4 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does Perfect Company rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Perfect Company ranks #11,767 of 50,000 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Perfect Company hold?

Perfect Company holds 26 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2024, spanning 18 technology areas.

What is Perfect Company's Innovation Score?

Perfect Company has an Innovation Score of 37.4 out of 100 (top 44% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Perfect Company focus on?

Perfect Company's top technology area is G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING) with 11 patents. Grants appear in 18 CPC subclasses total.

Is Perfect Company's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Perfect Company's recent grant velocity is +17% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Perfect Company's patents?

Perfect Company's patents average 17.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Perfect Company patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Perfect's 26 grants land it in the top 44% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Perfect ranks #11,767 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
Most of this portfolio concentrates in G06F - see who else leads that technology area. G06F leaders
Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.