PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Paver Technologies LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Paver ranks #29,752 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 2 technology areas.

#29,752
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
10th percentile
by Innovation Score (22.3/100)
11.9
avg claims per patent
-40%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R29752 · US Corporation #29,752 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
  • MID-PACK #29,752/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Parkson
  • CPC-NARROW C04B · 2 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 22.3/100
  • CLAIMS-PAR 11.9 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DOWN -40% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Parkson Corporation (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Paver’s 22.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Paver

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Paver's Innovation Score is 22.3/100 (10th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Paver?

Each dot is one of Paver’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Paver’s own 11.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 8.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Paver vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 8.98.999.1 05101520 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Parkson Corporation - 9, 16.89ParksonPass Stanztechnik AG - 9, 14.44Pass StanztechnikPatheon Austria GMBH & Co KG - 9, 10.11Patheon Austria &…Paul Smith Group Holdings Limited - 9, 1Paul Smith Group…Payless Shoesource Worldwide, Inc. - 9, 1Payless Shoesourc…PCO Group GMBH - 9, 2.78PCO GroupPellini S.p.A. - 9, 13.67Pellini S p APEM Management, Inc. - 9, 8PEM ManagementPaver Technologies LLC - 9, 11.89Paver
Paver vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Paver's grants concentrate

Paver Technologies LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 77.8% of grants classified under C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Paver sits between Parkson Corporation and PEM Management, Inc..

Paver's three-year grant acceleration

Paver Technologies LLC shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Paver's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Paver holds 9 patents at rank #29,713, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Paver

By rank, the assignees closest to #29,713 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C04B (Lime)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Paver's primary technology class.

Paver's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

22 10th percentile higher than 10% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 2017201820192020202120232025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Paver Technologies LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2017 1 11.1%
2018 3 33.3%
2019 1 11.1%
2020 1 11.1%
2021 1 11.1%
2023 1 11.1%
2025partial year 1 11.1%

Which technologies does Paver Technologies LLC patent most?

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Paver Technologies LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Paver Technologies LLC's lead technology class is C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone), 77.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C04B
  • Ranked #29,752 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Paver Technologies LLC against Parkson Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 22.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.