Where does Parexgroup SA rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Parexgroup SA ranks #32,808 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Parexgroup SA hold?

Parexgroup SA holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2024, spanning 11 technology areas.

What is Parexgroup SA's Innovation Score?

Parexgroup SA has an Innovation Score of 34.5 out of 100 (48th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Parexgroup SA's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Parexgroup SA's recent grant velocity is +0% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Parexgroup SA's patents?

Parexgroup SA's patents average 14.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Parexgroup SA patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Parexgroup SA

Q: What technology areas does Parexgroup SA focus on?

Parexgroup SA's top technology area is C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone) with 8 patents, ranking #181 of 1,052 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 11 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Parexgroup ranks #32,808 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 11 technology areas.

#32,808
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 48th percentile
by Innovation Score (34.5/100): 14.3
avg claims per patent: +0%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R32808 · Foreign Corporation #32,808 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #32,808/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Paolo Gobbi…
CPC-FOCUS C04B · 11 areas
INNOV-THIN 34.5/100
CLAIMS-RICH 14.3 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-FLAT +0% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Paolo Gobbi Frattini S.R.L. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Parexgroup’s 34.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (22%) Velocity 6.7 pts (19%) Breadth 11.7 pts (34%) Claim depth 8.5 pts (25%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Parexgroup · this assignee

35
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Parexgroup's Innovation Score is 34.5/100 (48th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Parexgroup?

Each dot is one of Parexgroup’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Parexgroup’s own 14.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 8.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Parexgroup vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Parexgroup's grants concentrate

Parexgroup SA is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Parexgroup sits between Paolo Gobbi Frattini S.R.L. and PECOFacet (US), Inc..

Parexgroup's three-year grant acceleration

Parexgroup SA shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Paolo Gobbi Fratt…

8
Paramount Jewels

8
Parasoft

8
Parexel Internati…

8
Pavlov Media

8
PDS

8
Pearson Engineeri…

8
Pecofacet (US)

8
Parexgroup ◀

8

What this shows Parexgroup holds 8 patents at rank #32,789, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Parexgroup

By rank, the assignees closest to #32,789 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C04B (Lime)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Parexgroup's primary technology class.

Parexgroup's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

35 48th percentile higher than 48% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Parexgroup SA patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	25.0%
2016	1	12.5%
2018	1	12.5%
2020	1	12.5%
2021	1	12.5%
2023	1	12.5%
2024	1	12.5%

Which technologies does Parexgroup SA patent most?

C04B - Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone 8

Y02W - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Wastewater Treatment OR Waste Management 4

B28B - Shaping Clay OR Other Ceramic COMPOSITIONS; Shaping SLAG; Shaping Mixtures Containing Cementitious Material, e.g. Plaster 2

B01F - Mixing, e.g. Dissolving, Emulsifying OR Dispersing 2

C09D - Coating Compositions, e.g. Paints, Varnishes OR LACQUERS; Filling PASTES; Chemical Paint OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; Correcting FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; Pastes OR Solids FOR Colouring OR PRINTING; USE OF Materials Therefor 1

E04C - Structural ELEMENTS; Building Materials 1

Y02A - Technologies FOR Adaptation TO Climate Change 1

E04B - General Building CONSTRUCTIONS; Walls, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; Insulation OR Other Protection OF Buildings 1

D10B - Indexing Scheme Associated With Sublasses OF Section D, Relating TO Textiles 1

D03D - Woven FABRICS; Methods OF WEAVING; Looms 1

E04G - SCAFFOLDING; FORMS; SHUTTERING; Building Implements OR Aids, OR Their USE; Handling Building Materials ON THE SITE; Repairing, Breaking-up OR Other Work ON Existing Buildings 1

Top 11 of 11 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Parexgroup SA's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Parexgroup SA's lead technology class is C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C04B
Ranked #32,808 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Parexgroup SA against Paolo Gobbi Frattini S.R.L., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 34.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.