Where does Parade Technologies, Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Parade Technologies, Ltd. ranks #2,828 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Parade Technologies, Ltd. hold?

Parade Technologies, Ltd. holds 136 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 23 technology areas.

What is Parade Technologies, Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Parade Technologies, Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 51.0 out of 100 (top 12% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Parade Technologies, Ltd. focus on?

Parade Technologies, Ltd.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 111 patents, ranking #502 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 23 CPC subclasses total.

Is Parade Technologies, Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Parade Technologies, Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is -78% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Parade Technologies, Ltd.'s patents?

Parade Technologies, Ltd.'s patents average 18.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Parade Technologies, Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Parade Technologies, Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 136 granted patents across 23 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Parade ranks #2,828 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 136 patents across 23 technology areas.

#2,828
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 12%
by Innovation Score (51.0/100): 18.6
avg claims per patent: -78%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R2828 · US Corporation #2,828 · 136 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 136 grants
TOP-DECILE #2,828/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Jungheinrich
CPC-FOCUS G06F · 23 areas
INNOV-PAR 51.0/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -78% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Jungheinrich AG (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Parade’s 51.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 17.0 pts (33%) Velocity 5.9 pts (12%) Breadth 17.0 pts (33%) Claim depth 11.2 pts (22%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Titan Medical · near

51
Celanese Sales Germany · near

51
Parade · this assignee

51
THE Board OF… · near

51
Electrocore · near

51
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Parade's Innovation Score is 51.0/100 (top 12% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Parade?

Each dot is one of Parade’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Parade’s own 18.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Parade vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Parade's grants concentrate

Parade Technologies, Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 23 CPC subclasses with 81.6% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (41 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2021. By volume, Parade sits between Jungheinrich AG and Syracuse University.

Parade's three-year grant acceleration

Parade Technologies, Ltd. shows 16 grants in 2022–2024 against only 18 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Jungheinrich

136
Nihon Micronics

136
Makino Milling Ma…

136
NOF

136
Playnitride Displ…

136
Shell USA

136
SK Chemicals

136
Syracuse Universi…

136
Parade ◀

136

What this shows Parade holds 136 patents at rank #2,828, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Parade

By rank, the assignees closest to #2,828 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Parade's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Parade, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), Parade ranks #502 of 13,878 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (51 here).

THE Board OF Regents OF THE Nevada System OF Higher Education ON Behalf OF THE University OF Nevada, LAS Vegas 51 Celanese Sales Germany GMBH 51 Electrocore, Inc. 51 Titan Medical Inc. 51

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (18.6 here).

Roblox Corporation 18.6 avg Polycom, LLC 18.6 avg Qualcomm Technologies International, Ltd. 18.6 avg FRIEDRICH-ALEXANDER-UNIVERSITÄT ERLANGEN-NÜRNBERG 18.6 avg

Parade's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

51 Top 12% higher than 88% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Parade Technologies, Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	22	16.2%
2016	41	30.1%
2017	23	16.9%
2018	11	8.1%
2019	10	7.4%
2020	5	3.7%
2021	3	2.2%
2022	6	4.4%
2023	4	2.9%
2024	6	4.4%
2025partial year	5	3.7%

Which technologies does Parade Technologies, Ltd. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 111

G01R - Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables 20

H03K - Pulse Technique 18

G09G - Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Devices Using Static Means TO Present Variable Information 18

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 8

G02F - Optical Devices OR Arrangements FOR THE Control OF Light BY Modification OF THE Optical Properties OF THE Media OF THE Elements Involved THEREIN; Non-linear OPTICS; Frequency-changing OF LIGHT; Optical Logic ELEMENTS; Optical ANALOGUE/DIGITAL Converters 7

Y02D - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN Information AND Communication Technologies [ICT], I.E. Information AND Communication Technologies Aiming AT THE Reduction OF Their OWN Energy USE 6

G01D - Measuring NOT Specially Adapted FOR A Specific VARIABLE; Arrangements FOR Measuring TWO OR More Variables NOT Covered IN A Single Other SUBCLASS; Tariff Metering APPARATUS; Measuring OR Testing NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 4

H02M - Apparatus FOR Conversion Between AC AND AC, Between AC AND DC, OR Between DC AND DC, AND FOR USE With Mains OR Similar Power Supply SYSTEMS; Conversion OF DC OR AC Input Power Into Surge Output POWER; Control OR Regulation Thereof 3

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 3

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 3

H03L - Automatic Control, Starting, Synchronisation OR Stabilisation OF Generators OF Electronic Oscillations OR Pulses 3

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 2

H03H - Impedance Networks, e.g. Resonant CIRCUITS; Resonators 2

H04B - Transmission 2

Top 15 of 23 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Parade Technologies, Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Parade Technologies, Ltd.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 81.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #2,828 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Parade Technologies, Ltd. against Jungheinrich AG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 51.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.