Where does Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd. ranks #27,057 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd. hold?

Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd. holds 10 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 27.0 out of 100 (22nd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is +100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd.'s patents?

Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd.'s patents average 4.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd.

Q: What technology areas does Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd. focus on?

Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd.'s top technology area is C01B (Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c) with 10 patents, ranking #220 of 1,689 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C01B (Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Osaka ranks #27,057 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 7 technology areas.

#27,057
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 22nd percentile
by Innovation Score (27.0/100): 4.5
avg claims per patent: +100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R27057 · Foreign Corporation #27,057 · 10 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
MID-PACK #27,057/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Oriental System…
CPC-NARROW C01B · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 27.0/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 4.5 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Oriental System Technology Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Osaka’s 27.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.3 pts (31%) Velocity 6.7 pts (25%) Breadth 9.4 pts (35%) Claim depth 2.7 pts (10%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Osaka Titanium · this assignee

27
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Osaka's Innovation Score is 27.0/100 (22nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Osaka?

Each dot is one of Osaka’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Osaka’s own 4.5 claims/patent is at or below the 16.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Osaka vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Osaka's grants concentrate

Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under C01B (Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Osaka sits between Oriental System Technology Inc. and OX Labs Inc..

Osaka's three-year grant acceleration

Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Oriental System T…

10
Orthobond

10
Orthodontic Resea…

10
Orthofix

10
OSI Optoelectroni…

10
OTOR

10
Outlast

10
OX Labs

10
Osaka Titanium ◀

10

What this shows Osaka holds 10 patents at rank #27,031, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Osaka

By rank, the assignees closest to #27,031 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C01B (Non-metallic Elements)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Osaka's primary technology class.

Osaka's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

27 22nd percentile higher than 22% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	10.0%
2019	2	20.0%
2020	1	10.0%
2021	1	10.0%
2022	1	10.0%
2023	2	20.0%
2024	1	10.0%
2025partial year	1	10.0%

Which technologies does Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd. patent most?

C01B - Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c 10

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 9

H01M - Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy 9

C01P - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Structural AND Physical Aspects OF Solid Inorganic Compounds 6

H01B - CABLES; CONDUCTORS; INSULATORS; Selection OF Materials FOR Their Conductive, Insulating OR Dielectric Properties 2

C23C - Coating Metallic MATERIAL; Coating Material With Metallic MATERIAL; Surface Treatment OF Metallic Material BY Diffusion Into THE Surface, BY Chemical Conversion OR SUBSTITUTION; Coating BY Vacuum Evaporation, BY Sputtering, BY ION Implantation OR BY Chemical Vapour Deposition, IN General 1

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is C01B (Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C01B
Ranked #27,057 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Osaka Titanium Technologies Co., Ltd. against Oriental System Technology Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 27.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.