Orkus Swim LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2021–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Orkus ranks #49,381 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #49,381
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 26th percentile
- by Innovation Score (28.1/100)
- 12.2
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49381 · US Corporation #49,381 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,381/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Orega Biotech
- CPC-NARROW A63B · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 28.1/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 12.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2021–2025 · 5y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Orega Biotech (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Orkus’s 28.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Orkus
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Orkus Swim · this assignee 28
Orkus Swim · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Orkus's Innovation Score is 28.1/100 (26th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Orkus?
Each dot is one of Orkus’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Orkus’s own 12.2 claims/patent is at or below the 16.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Orkus's grants concentrate
Orkus Swim LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). By volume, Orkus sits between Orega Biotech and OrthoScan, Inc..
Orkus's three-year grant acceleration
Orkus Swim LLC shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Orkus's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Orega Biotech
Orega Biotech
5 patents
- Organized Living
Organized Living, Inc.
5 patents
- Organofuel Sweden…
Organofuel Sweden AB
5 patents
- Origyn
Origyn LLC
5 patents
- Orolia USA
Orolia USA Inc.
5 patents
- Ortery
Ortery Technologies, Inc.
5 patents
- Ortho AI
Ortho AI LLC
5 patents
- Orthoscan
OrthoScan, Inc.
5 patents
- Orkus Swim ◀
Orkus Swim LLC
5 patents
What this shows Orkus holds 5 patents at rank #49,413, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Orkus
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,413 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Orkus's primary technology class.
- Acushnet Company 1,084 in class
- Nike, Inc. 843 in class
- Karsten Manufacturing Corporation 819 in class
- Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. 512 in class
- Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd. 436 in class
- Callaway Golf Company 398 in class
- Dunlop Sports Co., Ltd. 301 in class
- Parsons Xtreme Golf, LLC 264 in class
Orkus's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 26th percentile higher than 26% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2024 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Orkus Swim LLC patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Orkus Swim LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Orkus Swim LLC's lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
- Ranked #49,381 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Orkus Swim LLC against Orega Biotech, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 28.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.