Where does Organic Energy Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Organic Energy Corporation ranks #42,160 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Organic Energy Corporation hold?

Organic Energy Corporation holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2018, spanning 14 technology areas.

What is Organic Energy Corporation's Innovation Score?

Organic Energy Corporation has an Innovation Score of 31.6 out of 100 (38th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Organic Energy Corporation focus on?

Organic Energy Corporation's top technology area is B02C (Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain) with 6 patents, ranking #51 of 384 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 14 CPC subclasses total.

Is Organic Energy Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Organic Energy Corporation's recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Organic Energy Corporation's patents?

Organic Energy Corporation's patents average 19.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Organic Energy Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Organic Energy Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 14 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B02C (Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Organic ranks #42,160 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 14 technology areas.

#42,160
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 38th percentile
by Innovation Score (31.6/100): 19.5
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R42160 · US Corporation #42,160 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #42,160/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Orbit Communication…
CPC-FOCUS B02C · 14 areas
INNOV-THIN 31.6/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.5 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Orbit Communication Systems Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Organic’s 31.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (21%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 13.2 pts (42%) Claim depth 11.7 pts (37%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Organic Energy · this assignee

32
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Organic's Innovation Score is 31.6/100 (38th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Organic?

Each dot is one of Organic’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Organic’s own 19.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Organic vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Organic's grants concentrate

Organic Energy Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 14 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B02C (Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Organic sits between Orbit Communication Systems Ltd. and Ormazabal Y CIA, S.L.U..

Orbit Communicati…

6
Orca Computing

6
Ordos Yuansheng O…

6
Organ

6
Original Biomedic…

6
Original Ideas

6
Orion Engineered…

6
Ormazabal Y CIA S…

6
Organic Energy ◀

6

What this shows Organic holds 6 patents at rank #42,090, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Organic

By rank, the assignees closest to #42,090 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B02C (Crushing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Organic's primary technology class.

Organic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

32 38th percentile higher than 38% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2018

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Organic Energy Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	16.7%
2017	4	66.7%
2018	1	16.7%

Which technologies does Organic Energy Corporation patent most?

B02C - Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain 6

Y02W - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Wastewater Treatment OR Waste Management 6

B03B - Separating Solid Materials Using Liquids OR Using Pneumatic Tables OR Jigs 6

B07B - Separating Solids From Solids BY Sieving, Screening, Sifting OR BY Using GAS CURRENTS; Separating BY Other DRY Methods Applicable TO Bulk Material, e.g. Loose Articles FIT TO BE Handled Like Bulk Material 4

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 4

B03C - Magnetic OR Electrostatic Separation OF Solid Materials From Solid Materials OR FLUIDS; Separation BY High-voltage Electric Fields 2

C10L - Fuels NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Natural GAS; Synthetic Natural GAS Obtained BY Processes NOT Covered BY Subclasses C10g OR C10K; Liquified Petroleum GAS; USE OF Additives TO Fuels OR FIRES; Fire-lighters 2

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

C12P - Fermentation OR Enzyme-using Processes TO Synthesise A Desired Chemical Compound OR Composition OR TO Separate Optical Isomers From A Racemic Mixture 1

B09B - Disposal OF Solid Waste NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

Y02T - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation 1

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 1

C10G - Cracking Hydrocarbon OILS; Production OF Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixtures, e.g. BY Destructive Hydrogenation, Oligomerisation, Polymerisation ; Recovery OF Hydrocarbon Oils From Oil-shale, Oil-sand, OR GASES; Refining Mixtures Mainly Consisting OF HYDROCARBONS; Reforming OF NAPHTHA; Mineral Waxes 1

B29B - Preparation OR Pretreatment OF THE Material TO BE SHAPED; Making Granules OR PREFORMS; Recovery OF Plastics OR Other Constituents OF Waste Material Containing Plastics 1

Top 14 of 14 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Organic Energy Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Organic Energy Corporation's lead technology class is B02C (Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B02C
Ranked #42,160 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Organic Energy Corporation against Orbit Communication Systems Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 31.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.