Organic Chemical, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C08H (Derivatives OF Natural Macromolecular Compounds).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Organic ranks #42,159 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #42,159
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 29th percentile
- by Innovation Score (29.0/100)
- 9.3
- avg claims per patent
- +400%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R42159 · US Corporation #42,159 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #42,159/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Opus KSD
- CPC-NARROW C08H · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 29.0/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 9.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +400% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Opus KSD Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Organic’s 29.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Organic
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Organic Chemical · this assignee 29
Organic Chemical · this assignee
29 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Organic's Innovation Score is 29.0/100 (29th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Organic?
Each dot is one of Organic’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Organic’s own 9.3 claims/patent is at or below the 12.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Organic's grants concentrate
Organic Chemical, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under C08H (Derivatives OF Natural Macromolecular Compounds). By volume, Organic sits between Opus KSD Inc. and Orili Ventures Ltd.
Organic's three-year grant acceleration
Organic Chemical, LLC shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Organic's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Opus KSD
Opus KSD Inc.
6 patents
- Oracle Downhole S…
Oracle Downhole Services Ltd.
6 patents
- Orange Maker
Orange Maker, LLC
6 patents
- Oregon Dental
Oregon Dental, Inc.
6 patents
- Ori
Ori Inc.
6 patents
- Oria Collapsibles
Oria Collapsibles, LLC
6 patents
- Origenis
Origenis GMBH
6 patents
- Orili Ventures
Orili Ventures Ltd
6 patents
- Organic Chemical ◀
Organic Chemical, LLC
6 patents
What this shows Organic holds 6 patents at rank #42,155, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Organic
By rank, the assignees closest to #42,155 in granted patent volume.
- Opus KSD Inc. #42,151 · 6 patents
- Oracle Downhole Services Ltd. #42,152 · 6 patents
- Orange Maker, LLC #42,153 · 6 patents
- Oregon Dental, Inc. #42,154 · 6 patents
- Ori Inc. #42,156 · 6 patents
- Oria Collapsibles, LLC #42,157 · 6 patents
- Origenis GMBH #42,158 · 6 patents
- Orili Ventures Ltd #42,159 · 6 patents
Leaders in C08H (Derivatives OF Natural Macromolecular Compounds)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Organic's primary technology class.
Organic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
29 29th percentile higher than 29% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2021 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2022 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2023 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2024 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Organic Chemical, LLC patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Organic Chemical, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Organic Chemical, LLC's lead technology class is C08H (Derivatives OF Natural Macromolecular Compounds), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C08H
- Ranked #42,159 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Organic Chemical, LLC against Opus KSD Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 29.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.