Oregami, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Oregami ranks #49,369 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #49,369
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 17th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.3/100)
- 14.8
- avg claims per patent
- -33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49369 · US Corporation #49,369 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,369/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Orangetek
- CPC-NARROW A45C · 1 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DOWN -33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Orangetek Corporation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Oregami’s 25.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Oregami
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Oregami · this assignee 25
Oregami · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Oregami's Innovation Score is 25.3/100 (17th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Oregami?
Each dot is one of Oregami’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Oregami’s own 14.8 claims/patent is at or below the 14.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Oregami's grants concentrate
Oregami, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Oregami sits between Orangetek Corporation and Orgentec Diagnostika GMBH.
Oregami's three-year grant acceleration
Oregami, LLC shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Oregami's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Orangetek
Orangetek Corporation
5 patents
- Orbit Logic
Orbit Logic, Inc.
5 patents
- Orbital Marine Po…
Orbital Marine Power Limited
5 patents
- Orckit
Orckit Corporation
5 patents
- Orenda Automation
Orenda Automation Technologies, Inc.
5 patents
- Orfeo Soundworks
Orfeo Soundworks Corporation
5 patents
- Organik Kimya San…
Organik Kimya Sanayi VE TIC. A.S.
5 patents
- Orgentec Diagnost…
Orgentec Diagnostika GMBH
5 patents
- Oregami ◀
Oregami, LLC
5 patents
What this shows Oregami holds 5 patents at rank #49,300, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Oregami
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,300 in granted patent volume.
- Orangetek Corporation #49,296 · 5 patents
- Orbit Logic, Inc. #49,297 · 5 patents
- Orbital Marine Power Limited #49,298 · 5 patents
- Orckit Corporation #49,299 · 5 patents
- Orenda Automation Technologies, Inc. #49,301 · 5 patents
- Orfeo Soundworks Corporation #49,302 · 5 patents
- Organik Kimya Sanayi VE TIC. A.S. #49,303 · 5 patents
- Orgentec Diagnostika GMBH #49,304 · 5 patents
Leaders in A45C (Purses)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Oregami's primary technology class.
Oregami's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 17th percentile higher than 17% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Oregami, LLC patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Oregami, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Oregami, LLC's lead technology class is A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A45C
- Ranked #49,369 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Oregami, LLC against Orangetek Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.