Orbit Logic, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Orbit ranks #49,364 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #49,364
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 12th percentile
- by Innovation Score (23.4/100)
- 14.2
- avg claims per patent
- +50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49364 · US Corporation #49,364 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,364/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Optoquest
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 23.4/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Optoquest Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Orbit’s 23.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Orbit
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Orbit Logic · this assignee 23
Orbit Logic · this assignee
23 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Orbit's Innovation Score is 23.4/100 (12th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Orbit?
Each dot is one of Orbit’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Orbit’s own 14.2 claims/patent is at or below the 14.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Orbit's grants concentrate
Orbit Logic, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Orbit sits between Optoquest Co., Ltd. and Orenda Automation Technologies, Inc..
Who files at Orbit's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Optoquest
Optoquest Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Optoscribe
Optoscribe Limited
5 patents
- Optrascan
Optrascan, Inc
5 patents
- Orangetek
Orangetek Corporation
5 patents
- Orbital Marine Po…
Orbital Marine Power Limited
5 patents
- Orckit
Orckit Corporation
5 patents
- Oregami
Oregami, LLC
5 patents
- Orenda Automation
Orenda Automation Technologies, Inc.
5 patents
- Orbit Logic ◀
Orbit Logic, Inc.
5 patents
What this shows Orbit holds 5 patents at rank #49,297, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Orbit
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,297 in granted patent volume.
- Optoquest Co., Ltd. #49,293 · 5 patents
- Optoscribe Limited #49,294 · 5 patents
- Optrascan, Inc #49,295 · 5 patents
- Orangetek Corporation #49,296 · 5 patents
- Orbital Marine Power Limited #49,298 · 5 patents
- Orckit Corporation #49,299 · 5 patents
- Oregami, LLC #49,300 · 5 patents
- Orenda Automation Technologies, Inc. #49,301 · 5 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Orbit's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Orbit's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 12th percentile higher than 12% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Orbit Logic, Inc. patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Orbit Logic, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Orbit Logic, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #49,364 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Orbit Logic, Inc. against Optoquest Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 23.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.