Optimum Technologies, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47G (Household OR Table Equipment).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Optimum ranks #49,350 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #49,350
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 23rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.3/100)
- 19.4
- avg claims per patent
- -33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49350 · US Corporation #49,350 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,350/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Optimal Ranging
- CPC-NARROW A47G · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DOWN -33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Optimal Ranging, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Optimum’s 27.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Optimum
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Optimum · this assignee 27
Optimum · this assignee
27 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Optimum's Innovation Score is 27.3/100 (23rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Optimum?
Each dot is one of Optimum’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Optimum’s own 19.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 18.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Optimum's grants concentrate
Optimum Technologies, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under A47G (Household OR Table Equipment). By volume, Optimum sits between Optimal Ranging, Inc. and Optrascan, Inc.
Optimum's three-year grant acceleration
Optimum Technologies, Inc. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Optimum's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Optimal Ranging
Optimal Ranging, Inc.
5 patents
- Optimares S p A
Optimares S.p.A.
5 patents
- Optimized Markets
Optimized Markets, Inc.
5 patents
- Optimum Petroleum…
Optimum Petroleum Services Inc.
5 patents
- Opto Engineering…
Opto Engineering S.P.A.
5 patents
- Optoquest
Optoquest Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Optoscribe
Optoscribe Limited
5 patents
- Optrascan
Optrascan, Inc
5 patents
- Optimum ◀
Optimum Technologies, Inc.
5 patents
What this shows Optimum holds 5 patents at rank #49,291, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Optimum
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,291 in granted patent volume.
- Optimal Ranging, Inc. #49,287 · 5 patents
- Optimares S.p.A. #49,288 · 5 patents
- Optimized Markets, Inc. #49,289 · 5 patents
- Optimum Petroleum Services Inc. #49,290 · 5 patents
- Opto Engineering S.P.A. #49,292 · 5 patents
- Optoquest Co., Ltd. #49,293 · 5 patents
- Optoscribe Limited #49,294 · 5 patents
- Optrascan, Inc #49,295 · 5 patents
Leaders in A47G (Household OR Table Equipment)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Optimum's primary technology class.
Optimum's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 23rd percentile higher than 23% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2016 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Optimum Technologies, Inc. patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Optimum Technologies, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Optimum Technologies, Inc.'s lead technology class is A47G (Household OR Table Equipment), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47G
- Ranked #49,350 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Optimum Technologies, Inc. against Optimal Ranging, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.