NetBio, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Netbio ranks #23,066 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 12 technology areas.
- #23,066
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 40th percentile
- by Innovation Score (32.0/100)
- 18.1
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R23066 · US Corporation #23,066 · 12 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
- MID-PACK #23,066/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Neo-Sync
- CPC-FOCUS G01N · 12 areas
- INNOV-THIN 32.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Neo-Sync LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Netbio’s 32.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Netbio
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- NetBio · this assignee 32
NetBio · this assignee
32 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Netbio's Innovation Score is 32.0/100 (40th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Netbio?
Each dot is one of Netbio’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Netbio’s own 18.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Netbio's grants concentrate
NetBio, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Netbio sits between Neo-Sync LLC and Nevada Nanotech Systems Inc..
Who files at NetBio's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Neo-sync
Neo-Sync LLC
12 patents
- Neodrill AS
NeoDrill AS
12 patents
- Neotech Products
Neotech Products, LLC
12 patents
- Ness Inventions
Ness Inventions, Inc.
12 patents
- Neuraxis
Neuraxis, Inc.
12 patents
- Neuropore Therapi…
Neuropore Therapies, Inc.
12 patents
- Neurostructures
Neurostructures, Inc.
12 patents
- Nevada Nanotech S…
Nevada Nanotech Systems Inc.
12 patents
- Netbio ◀
NetBio, Inc.
12 patents
What this shows NetBio holds 12 patents at rank #23,086, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near NetBio
By rank, the assignees closest to #23,086 in granted patent volume.
- Neo-Sync LLC #23,082 · 12 patents
- NeoDrill AS #23,083 · 12 patents
- Neotech Products, LLC #23,084 · 12 patents
- Ness Inventions, Inc. #23,085 · 12 patents
- Neuraxis, Inc. #23,087 · 12 patents
- Neuropore Therapies, Inc. #23,088 · 12 patents
- Neurostructures, Inc. #23,089 · 12 patents
- Nevada Nanotech Systems Inc. #23,090 · 12 patents
Leaders in G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in NetBio's primary technology class.
- The Regents of the University of California 1,153 in class
- Shimadzu Corporation 1,111 in class
- Saudi Arabian OIL Company 837 in class
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. 816 in class
- The Boeing Company 701 in class
- General Electric Company 634 in class
- Kla-tencor Corporation 583 in class
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology 530 in class
Netbio's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 40th percentile higher than 40% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 25.0% |
| 2016 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 8.3% |
Which technologies does NetBio, Inc. patent most?
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
NetBio, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- NetBio, Inc.'s lead technology class is G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01N
- Ranked #23,066 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare NetBio, Inc. against Neo-Sync LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 32.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.