USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

National ICT Australia Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 46 granted patents across 39 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING).

46
Total patents granted
39
CPC technology areas
17.9
Avg claims per patent
-61%
5-year grant velocity

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, National ranks #7,166 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 46 patents across 39 technology areas.

#7,166
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 17%
by Innovation Score (48.5/100)
17.9
avg claims per patent
-61%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

National ICT Australia Limited has been granted 46 US utility patents between 2015 and 2022, placing National ICT Australia Limited at #7,166 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 39 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.9 claims per patent with primary concentration in G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING). As a Foreign Corporation, National ICT Australia Limited is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, National sits between Menasha Corporation (46 patents, rank #7,163) and Nortek Air Solutions Canada, Inc. (46 patents, rank #7,171) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 48.5/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 13 grants, compared with 33 in the 2015–2019 window, a -61% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The Foreign Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.

Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. National ICT Australia Limited's 17.9 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 39 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.

Who files at National's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows National holds 46 patents at rank #7,167, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near National

By rank, the assignees closest to #7,167 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital DATA Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in National's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for National, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

National's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

48 Top 17% higher than 83% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

024681012 20152016201720182019202020212022 6
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
National ICT Australia Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 4 8.7%
2016 5 10.9%
2017 5 10.9%
2018 9 19.6%
2019 10 21.7%
2020 5 10.9%
2021 2 4.3%
2022 6 13.0%

Which technologies does National ICT Australia Limited patent most?

Top 15 of 39 technology areas

Grant record at a glance

Portfolio Volume 46 grants
CPC subclasses 39
Avg. claims / grant 17.9
Velocity -61%

Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#7,166

of 50,000 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

48.5 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does National ICT Australia Limited rank among US patent assignees?
According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), National ICT Australia Limited ranks #7,166 of 50,000 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.
How many patents does National ICT Australia Limited hold?
National ICT Australia Limited holds 46 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2022, spanning 39 technology areas.
What is National ICT Australia Limited's Innovation Score?
National ICT Australia Limited has an Innovation Score of 48.5 out of 100 (top 17% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does National ICT Australia Limited focus on?
National ICT Australia Limited's top technology area is G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING) with 17 patents. Grants appear in 39 CPC subclasses total.
Is National ICT Australia Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?
National ICT Australia Limited's recent grant velocity is -61% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.
What does claim depth mean for National ICT Australia Limited's patents?
National ICT Australia Limited's patents average 17.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.
How is the National ICT Australia Limited patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

National's 46 grants land it in the top 17% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - National ranks #7,166 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in G06F - see who else leads that technology area. G06F leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.