Overall rank by patents
#26,936
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Nara ranks #26,936 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 5 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R26936 · US Corporation #26,936 · 10 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Nanjing Silergy Micro (HK) Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Nara Logics · this assignee
32 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Nara's Innovation Score is 31.8/100 (39th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Nara Logics, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Nara sits between Nanjing Silergy Micro (HK) Co., Ltd. and National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA).
Nara Logics, Inc. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Nanjing Silergy Micro (HK) Co., Ltd.
10 patents
Nanomix, Inc.
10 patents
Nanotheta Co, Ltd.
10 patents
NantStudios, LLC
10 patents
National Engineering Research Center of Advanced Energy Storage Materials (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd
10 patents
National Entertainment Collectibles Association, Inc.
10 patents
National Institute of Radiological Sciences
10 patents
National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA)
10 patents
Nara Logics, Inc.
10 patents
What this shows Nara holds 10 patents at rank #26,962, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #26,962 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Nara's primary technology class.
Nara's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 39th percentile higher than 39% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2016 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2023 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 10.0% |
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#26,936
of 49,997 tracked assignees
31.8 out of 100
What to do with this data
Nara Logics, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.