PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Nano-second Technology Co., Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Nano-second ranks #29,541 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 3 technology areas.

#29,541
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 29%
by Innovation Score (43.1/100)
15.1
avg claims per patent
-20%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R29541 · Foreign Corporation #29,541 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
  • MID-PACK #29,541/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Nabrawind SL
  • CPC-NARROW A63B · 3 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 43.1/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 15.1 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DOWN -20% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Nabrawind Technologies, SL (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Nano-second’s 43.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Nano-second

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Nano-second's Innovation Score is 43.1/100 (top 29% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Nano-second?

Each dot is one of Nano-second’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Nano-second’s own 15.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Nano-second vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 8.98.999.1 101520253035 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Nabrawind Technologies, SL - 9, 14.44Nabrawind SLNAL Pharmaceutical Group Limited - 9, 15NAL Pharmaceutica…Nanjing Nutrabuilding Bio-tech Co., Ltd. - 9, 12.11Nanjing Nutrabuil…Nanjing Sanhome Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. - 9, 13.67Nanjing Sanhome P…Nanoear Corporation, Inc. - 9, 20NanoearNanohive Medical LLC - 9, 17.44Nanohive MedicalNanophoton Corporation - 9, 16.11NanophotonNanoptics, Incorporated - 9, 32.33Nanoptics Incorpo…Nano-second Technology Co., Ltd. - 9, 15.11Nano-second Techn…
Nano-second vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Nano-second's grants concentrate

Nano-second Technology Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Nano-second sits between Nabrawind Technologies, SL and Nanoptics, Incorporated.

Nano-second's three-year grant acceleration

Nano-second Technology Co., Ltd. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Nano-second's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Nano-second holds 9 patents at rank #29,511, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Nano-second

By rank, the assignees closest to #29,511 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Nano-second's primary technology class.

Nano-second's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

43 Top 29% higher than 71% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 201620172018201920232024 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Nano-second Technology Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 1 11.1%
2017 2 22.2%
2018 1 11.1%
2019 1 11.1%
2023 3 33.3%
2024 1 11.1%

Which technologies does Nano-second Technology Co., Ltd. patent most?

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Nano-second Technology Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Nano-second Technology Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
  • Ranked #29,541 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Nano-second Technology Co., Ltd. against Nabrawind Technologies, SL, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 43.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.