Motive Power Industry Co., Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16H (Gearing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Motive ranks #32,547 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #32,547
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 6th percentile
- by Innovation Score (19.2/100)
- 7.5
- avg claims per patent
- -86%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R32547 · Foreign Corporation #32,547 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #32,547/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Mologic
- CPC-NARROW F16H · 4 areas
- INNOV-LOW 19.2/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -86% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Mologic Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Motive’s 19.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Motive
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Motive Power Industry · this assignee 19
Motive Power Industry · this assignee
19 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Motive's Innovation Score is 19.2/100 (6th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Motive?
Each dot is one of Motive’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Motive’s own 7.5 claims/patent is at or below the 10.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Motive's grants concentrate
Motive Power Industry Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 75% of grants classified under F16H (Gearing). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Motive sits between Mologic Limited and MS Directional, LLC.
Who files at Motive's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Mologic
Mologic Limited
8 patents
- Molteni & C S P A
Molteni & C. S.P.A.
8 patents
- MON Bento
MON Bento
8 patents
- Mori Seiki
Mori Seiki Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- Mountain Valley MD
Mountain Valley MD Inc.
8 patents
- Mpnics
Mpnics Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- MRV Systems
MRV Systems, LLC
8 patents
- MS Directional
MS Directional, LLC
8 patents
- Motive Power Indu… ◀
Motive Power Industry Co., Ltd.
8 patents
What this shows Motive holds 8 patents at rank #32,463, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Motive
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,463 in granted patent volume.
- Mologic Limited #32,459 · 8 patents
- Molteni & C. S.P.A. #32,460 · 8 patents
- MON Bento #32,461 · 8 patents
- Mori Seiki Co., Ltd. #32,462 · 8 patents
- Mountain Valley MD Inc. #32,464 · 8 patents
- Mpnics Co., Ltd. #32,465 · 8 patents
- MRV Systems, LLC #32,466 · 8 patents
- MS Directional, LLC #32,467 · 8 patents
Leaders in F16H (Gearing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Motive's primary technology class.
- Hyundai Motor Company 1,326 in class
- Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha 1,070 in class
- ZF Friedrichshafen AG 904 in class
- Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG 820 in class
- Ford Global Technologies, LLC 718 in class
- GM Global Technology Operations LLC 705 in class
- Honda Motor Co., Ltd. 660 in class
- KIA Motors Corporation 571 in class
Motive's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
19 6th percentile higher than 6% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2019 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does Motive Power Industry Co., Ltd. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Motive Power Industry Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Motive Power Industry Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is F16H (Gearing), 75% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16H
- Ranked #32,547 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Motive Power Industry Co., Ltd. against Mologic Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 19.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.