USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Moon Surgical SAS

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 20 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Moon ranks #14,789 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 20 patents across 4 technology areas.

#14,789
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 10%
by Innovation Score (52.6/100)
27.1
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R14789 · Foreign Corporation #14,789 · 20 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-SMALL 20 grants
  • MID-PACK #14,789/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Mitobridge
  • CPC-NARROW A61B · 4 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 52.6/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 27.1 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Mitobridge, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Moon’s 52.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Moon

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Moon's Innovation Score is 52.6/100 (top 10% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Moon?

Each dot is one of Moon’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Moon’s own 27.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Moon vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 19.919.92020.1 51015202530 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Mitobridge, Inc. - 20, 17.9MitobridgeModern Technology Solutions, Inc. - 20, 16.95Modern Technology…Monolith Semiconductor, Inc. - 20, 14.65Monolith Semicond…Montag Investments, LLC - 20, 14.8Montag InvestmentsMotus GI Medical Technologies Ltd. - 20, 20.4Motus GI MedicalMusic Choice - 20, 15.5Music ChoiceNagase & Co., Ltd. - 20, 10.05Nagase &Nano-c, Inc. - 20, 23.25Nano-cMoon Surgical SAS - 20, 27.05Moon Surgical SAS
Moon vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Moon's grants concentrate

Moon Surgical SAS is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (9 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Moon sits between Mitobridge, Inc. and Nano-c, Inc..

Moon's three-year grant acceleration

Moon Surgical SAS shows 17 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Moon's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Moon holds 20 patents at rank #14,788, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Moon

By rank, the assignees closest to #14,788 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Moon's primary technology class.

Moon's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

53 Top 10% higher than 90% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0246810 2022202320242025 3
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2022–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Moon Surgical SAS patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2022 1 5.0%
2023 9 45.0%
2024 7 35.0%
2025partial year 3 15.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Moon Surgical SAS's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Moon Surgical SAS's lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
  • Ranked #14,789 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Moon Surgical SAS against Mitobridge, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 52.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.