Where does MongoDB, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), MongoDB, Inc. ranks #3,933 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does MongoDB, Inc. hold?

MongoDB, Inc. holds 92 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is MongoDB, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

MongoDB, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 41.6 out of 100 (top 33% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does MongoDB, Inc. focus on?

MongoDB, Inc.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 90 patents, ranking #593 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is MongoDB, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

MongoDB, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +157% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for MongoDB, Inc.'s patents?

MongoDB, Inc.'s patents average 21.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the MongoDB, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

MongoDB, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 92 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Mongodb ranks #3,933 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 92 patents across 5 technology areas.

#3,933
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 33%
by Innovation Score (41.6/100): 21.1
avg claims per patent: +157%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R3933 · US Corporation #3,933 · 92 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 92 grants
TOP-DECILE #3,933/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Liqid
CPC-NARROW G06F · 5 areas
INNOV-PAR 41.6/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 21.1 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +157% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Liqid Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Mongodb’s 41.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 15.7 pts (38%) Velocity 5.4 pts (13%) Breadth 7.9 pts (19%) Claim depth 12.6 pts (30%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Callsign · near

42
Geka · near

42
MongoDB · this assignee

42
The Technology… · near

42
Wonderland Nurserygo… · near

42
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Mongodb's Innovation Score is 41.6/100 (top 33% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Mongodb?

Each dot is one of Mongodb’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Mongodb’s own 21.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Mongodb vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Mongodb's grants concentrate

MongoDB, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 97.8% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (21 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Mongodb sits between Liqid Inc. and Orbital Research Inc..

Mongodb's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, MongoDB, Inc. moved from 38 to 31 grants (0.82x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Liqid

92
Mainstream Engine…

92
Master Lock

92
Microvision

92
Morphotrust USA

92
Nautilus

92
Nicoventures Hold…

92
Orbital Research

92
Mongodb ◀

92

What this shows MongoDB holds 92 patents at rank #3,933, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near MongoDB

By rank, the assignees closest to #3,933 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in MongoDB's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for MongoDB, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), MongoDB ranks #593 of 13,878 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (42 here).

Wonderland Nurserygoods Company Limited 42 Geka GmbH 42 The Technology Partnership PLC 42 Callsign Inc. 42

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (21.1 here).

Achillion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 21.1 avg MasterCraft Boat Company, LLC 21.1 avg Valens Semiconductor Ltd. 21.1 avg Institute for Research in Biomedicine 21.1 avg

Mongodb's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

42 Top 33% higher than 67% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

MongoDB, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	3.3%
2016	2	2.2%
2017	5	5.4%
2018	3	3.3%
2019	10	10.9%
2020	21	22.8%
2021	7	7.6%
2022	14	15.2%
2023	12	13.0%
2024	5	5.4%
2025partial year	10	10.9%

Which technologies does MongoDB, Inc. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 90

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 21

Y10S - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former Uspc Cross-reference ART Collections [XRACs] AND Digests 4

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 2

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 2

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

MongoDB, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

MongoDB, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 97.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #3,933 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare MongoDB, Inc. against Liqid Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 41.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.