Where does Molecular Rebar Design, LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Molecular Rebar Design, LLC ranks #8,875 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Molecular Rebar Design, LLC hold?

Molecular Rebar Design, LLC holds 36 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 36 technology areas.

What is Molecular Rebar Design, LLC's Innovation Score?

Molecular Rebar Design, LLC has an Innovation Score of 46.7 out of 100 (top 20% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Molecular Rebar Design, LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Molecular Rebar Design, LLC's recent grant velocity is -35% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Molecular Rebar Design, LLC's patents?

Molecular Rebar Design, LLC's patents average 18.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Molecular Rebar Design, LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Molecular Rebar Design, LLC

Q: What technology areas does Molecular Rebar Design, LLC focus on?

Molecular Rebar Design, LLC's top technology area is C01B (Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c) with 24 patents, ranking #88 of 1,689 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 36 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 36 granted patents across 36 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C01B (Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Molecular ranks #8,875 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 36 patents across 36 technology areas.

#8,875
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 20%
by Innovation Score (46.7/100): 18.0
avg claims per patent: -35%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R8875 · US Corporation #8,875 · 36 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 36 grants
UPPER-Q #8,875/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Mako Rentals
CPC-FOCUS C01B · 36 areas
INNOV-PAR 46.7/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -35% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Mako Rentals, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Molecular’s 46.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 12.5 pts (27%) Velocity 2.2 pts (5%) Breadth 21.2 pts (45%) Claim depth 10.8 pts (23%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
FireEye · near

47
HSG · near

47
Japan Cash Machine · near

47
Johnson Controls · near

47
Molecular Rebar Design · this assignee

47
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Molecular's Innovation Score is 46.7/100 (top 20% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Molecular?

Each dot is one of Molecular’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Molecular’s own 18.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Molecular vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Molecular's grants concentrate

Molecular Rebar Design, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 36 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under C01B (Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Molecular sits between Mhwirth AS and Malaysian Palm Oil Board.

Molecular's three-year grant acceleration

Molecular Rebar Design, LLC shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 12 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Mhwirth AS

36
Microtecnica S R L

36
Mikro Systems

36
Mmodal IP

36
MSG Entertainment…

36
Muhr UND Bender KG

36
Mako Rentals

36
Malaysian Palm Oi…

36
Molecular Rebar D… ◀

36

What this shows Molecular holds 36 patents at rank #8,866, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Molecular

By rank, the assignees closest to #8,866 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C01B (Non-metallic Elements)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Molecular's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Molecular, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In C01B (Non-metallic Elements), Molecular ranks #88 of 1,689 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (47 here).

Japan Cash Machine Co., Ltd. 47 Johnson Controls, Inc. 47 FireEye, Inc. 47 HSG, LLC 47

Molecular's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

47 Top 20% higher than 80% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Molecular Rebar Design, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	4	11.1%
2016	5	13.9%
2017	3	8.3%
2018	5	13.9%
2019	3	8.3%
2020	4	11.1%
2021	5	13.9%
2022	1	2.8%
2023	2	5.6%
2024	1	2.8%
2025partial year	3	8.3%

Which technologies does Molecular Rebar Design, LLC patent most?

C01B - Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c 24

B82Y - Specific Uses OR Applications OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Measurement OR Analysis OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Manufacture OR Treatment OF Nanostructures 23

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 22

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 16

C01P - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Structural AND Physical Aspects OF Solid Inorganic Compounds 12

H01M - Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy 12

C08J - WORKING-UP; General Processes OF COMPOUNDING; After-treatment NOT Covered BY Subclasses C08b, C08c, C08f, C08g or C08h 11

C09K - Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 11

C08L - Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds 10

A61K - Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes 10

Y10S - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former Uspc Cross-reference ART Collections [XRACs] AND Digests 10

C08C - Treatment OR Chemical Modification OF Rubbers 8

B60C - Vehicle TYRES; Tyre INFLATION; Tyre CHANGING; Connecting Valves TO Inflatable Elastic Bodies IN GENERAL; Devices OR Arrangements Related TO Tyres 8

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 5

C02F - Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge 5

Top 15 of 36 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Molecular Rebar Design, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Molecular Rebar Design, LLC's lead technology class is C01B (Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C01B
Ranked #8,875 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Molecular Rebar Design, LLC against Mhwirth AS, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 46.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.