Where does MMT, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), MMT, Inc. ranks #23,008 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does MMT, Inc. hold?

MMT, Inc. holds 12 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2024, spanning 15 technology areas.

What is MMT, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

MMT, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 42.4 out of 100 (top 31% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does MMT, Inc. focus on?

MMT, Inc.'s top technology area is H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines) with 6 patents, ranking #401 of 1,724 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 15 CPC subclasses total.

Is MMT, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for MMT, Inc..

What does claim depth mean for MMT, Inc.'s patents?

MMT, Inc.'s patents average 17.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the MMT, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

MMT, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 15 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, MMT ranks #23,008 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 15 technology areas.

#23,008
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 31%
by Innovation Score (42.4/100): 17.5
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R23008 · US Corporation #23,008 · 12 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
MID-PACK #23,008/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Mitsubishi Generator
CPC-FOCUS H02K · 15 areas
INNOV-PAR 42.4/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.5 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2020–2024 · 5y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Mitsubishi Generator Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How MMT’s 42.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.9 pts (21%) Velocity 9.3 pts (22%) Breadth 13.7 pts (32%) Claim depth 10.5 pts (25%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
MMT · this assignee

42
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows MMT's Innovation Score is 42.4/100 (top 31% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for MMT?

Each dot is one of MMT’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). MMT’s own 17.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

MMT vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where MMT's grants concentrate

MMT, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 15 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, MMT sits between Mitsubishi Generator Co., Ltd. and Moffett International Co., Limited.

MMT's three-year grant acceleration

MMT, Inc. shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Mitsubishi Genera…

12
Mitsubishi Heavy…

12
Mitsubishi Shipbu…

12
Miworld Accessori…

12
Mobilion Systems

12
Modulex

12
Modus Test

12
Moffett Internati…

12
MMT ◀

12

What this shows MMT holds 12 patents at rank #22,961, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near MMT

By rank, the assignees closest to #22,961 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in MMT's primary technology class.

MMT's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

42 Top 31% higher than 69% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

MMT, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	2	16.7%
2021	3	25.0%
2022	1	8.3%
2023	5	41.7%
2024	1	8.3%

Which technologies does MMT, Inc. patent most?

H02K - Dynamo-electric Machines 6

E03B - Installations OR Methods FOR Obtaining, Collecting, OR Distributing Water 3

E03F - SEWERS; Cesspools 3

C02F - Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge 3

Y02A - Technologies FOR Adaptation TO Climate Change 3

F16H - Gearing 3

H02P - Control OR Regulation OF Electric Motors, Electric Generators OR Dynamo-electric CONVERTERS; Controlling Transformers, Reactors OR Choke Coils 2

F16K - VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating 2

H03K - Pulse Technique 1

Y02W - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Wastewater Treatment OR Waste Management 1

Y02T - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation 1

F02M - Supplying Combustion Engines IN General With Combustible Mixtures OR Constituents Thereof 1

F02B - Internal-combustion Piston ENGINES; Combustion Engines IN General 1

B60H - Arrangements OF Heating, Cooling, Ventilating OR Other Air-treating Devices Specially Adapted FOR Passenger OR Goods Spaces OF Vehicles 1

F01L - Cyclically Operating Valves FOR Machines OR Engines 1

Top 15 of 15 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

MMT, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

MMT, Inc.'s lead technology class is H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H02K
Ranked #23,008 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare MMT, Inc. against Mitsubishi Generator Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 42.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.