MJP Innovations, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, MJP ranks #41,735 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #41,735
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 6th percentile
- by Innovation Score (19.9/100)
- 11.7
- avg claims per patent
- -50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R41735 · US Corporation #41,735 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #41,735/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Mitre Sports…
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 3 areas
- INNOV-LOW 19.9/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 11.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Mitre Sports International Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How MJP’s 19.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around MJP
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- MJP Innovations · this assignee 20
MJP Innovations · this assignee
20 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows MJP's Innovation Score is 19.9/100 (6th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for MJP?
Each dot is one of MJP’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). MJP’s own 11.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where MJP's grants concentrate
MJP Innovations, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, MJP sits between Mitre Sports International Limited and Mobiwork, LLC.
Who files at MJP's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Mitre Sports Inte…
Mitre Sports International Limited
6 patents
- Mitsubishi Mahind…
Mitsubishi Mahindra Agricultural Machinery Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Mixi
Mixi, Inc.
6 patents
- MJ Stewart Invest…
MJ Stewart Investments, LLC
6 patents
- ML Technology
ML Technology Ltd.
6 patents
- MLS
MLS Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- MMJ Labs
MMJ Labs, LLC
6 patents
- Mobiwork
Mobiwork, LLC
6 patents
- MJP Innovations ◀
MJP Innovations, Inc.
6 patents
What this shows MJP holds 6 patents at rank #41,607, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near MJP
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,607 in granted patent volume.
- Mitre Sports International Limited #41,603 · 6 patents
- Mitsubishi Mahindra Agricultural Machinery Co., Ltd. #41,604 · 6 patents
- Mixi, Inc. #41,605 · 6 patents
- MJ Stewart Investments, LLC #41,606 · 6 patents
- ML Technology Ltd. #41,608 · 6 patents
- MLS Co., Ltd. #41,609 · 6 patents
- MMJ Labs, LLC #41,610 · 6 patents
- Mobiwork, LLC #41,611 · 6 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in MJP's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
MJP's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
20 6th percentile higher than 6% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2021 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does MJP Innovations, Inc. patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
MJP Innovations, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- MJP Innovations, Inc.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #41,735 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare MJP Innovations, Inc. against Mitre Sports International Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 19.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.