Overall rank by patents
#48,842
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2017–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B65D (CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR F).
The verdict
Metsä holds 5 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #48,842 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Metsä Board Oyj has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2017 and 2024, placing Metsä Board Oyj at rank #48,842 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 16.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in B65D (CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR F). As a Foreign Corporation, Metsä Board Oyj is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Metsä sits between Metall + Plastic Gmbh (5 patents, rank #48,838) and Michael Hill Franchise Pty Limited (5 patents, rank #48,846) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 29.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 1 grants, compared with 4 in the 2015–2019 window, a -75% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Metsä Board Oyj's 16.2 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Metsä Board Oyj against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Metall + Plastic GmbH
5 patents
Metirionic GmbH
5 patents
Metselex, inc.
5 patents
Metso Finland Oy
5 patents
Metzner Holding GmbH
5 patents
Mewt LLC
5 patents
MiTAC Research (Shanghai) Ltd.
5 patents
Michael Hill Franchise Pty Limited
5 patents
Metsä Board Oyj
5 patents
What this shows Metsä holds 5 patents at rank #48,842, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,842 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Metsä's primary technology class.
Metsä's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 Top 69% higher than 31% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 20.0% |
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#48,842
Across all tracked assignees
29.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Metsä's 5 grants land it in the top 69% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.