Metactive Medical, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Metactive ranks #48,696 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #48,696
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 38th percentile
- by Innovation Score (31.6/100)
- 32.8
- avg claims per patent
- +50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R48696 · US Corporation #48,696 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #48,696/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH MeshPlusPlus
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 31.6/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 32.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: MeshPlusPlus, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Metactive’s 31.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Metactive
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Metactive Medical · this assignee 32
Metactive Medical · this assignee
32 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Metactive's Innovation Score is 31.6/100 (38th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Metactive?
Each dot is one of Metactive’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Metactive’s own 32.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Metactive's grants concentrate
Metactive Medical, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, Metactive sits between MeshPlusPlus, Inc. and Metselex, inc..
Metactive's three-year grant acceleration
Metactive Medical, Inc. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Metactive's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Meshplusplus
MeshPlusPlus, Inc.
5 patents
- Mesosphere
Mesosphere, Inc.
5 patents
- Meta4sys
Meta4sys Limited
5 patents
- Metafluent
MetaFluent, LLC
5 patents
- Metadata
Metadata, Inc.
5 patents
- Metall + Plastic
Metall + Plastic GmbH
5 patents
- Metirionic
Metirionic GmbH
5 patents
- Metselex
Metselex, inc.
5 patents
- Metactive Medical ◀
Metactive Medical, Inc.
5 patents
What this shows Metactive holds 5 patents at rank #48,836, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Metactive
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,836 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Metactive's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
Metactive's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 38th percentile higher than 38% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2020 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Metactive Medical, Inc. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Metactive Medical, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Metactive Medical, Inc.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #48,696 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Metactive Medical, Inc. against MeshPlusPlus, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 31.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.