Medtronic Vascular Galway Unlimited Company
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 64 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive Device).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Medtronic ranks #5,381 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 64 patents across 10 technology areas.
- #5,381
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 32%
- by Innovation Score (41.9/100)
- 16.6
- avg claims per patent
- -32%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R5381 · Foreign Corporation #5,381 · 64 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 64 grants
- UPPER-Q #5,381/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Light Field Lab
- CPC-FOCUS A61F · 10 areas
- INNOV-PAR 41.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DOWN -32% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Light Field Lab, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Medtronic’s 41.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Medtronic
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Bestechnic (Shanghai) · near
Bestechnic (Shanghai) · near
42 score
- Ibex PT Holdings · near
Ibex PT Holdings · near
42 score
- Medtronic Vascular… · this assignee
Medtronic Vascular… · this assignee
42 score
- MGC Filsheet · near
MGC Filsheet · near
42 score
- Xieon Networks r l · near
Xieon Networks r l · near
42 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Medtronic's Innovation Score is 41.9/100 (top 32% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Medtronic?
Each dot is one of Medtronic’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Medtronic’s own 16.6 claims/patent is at or below the 17.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Medtronic's grants concentrate
Medtronic Vascular Galway Unlimited Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 90.6% of grants classified under A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive Device). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (11 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2021. By volume, Medtronic sits between Light Field Lab, Inc. and Mid-West Metal Products Company, Inc..
Medtronic's three-year grant acceleration
Medtronic Vascular Galway Unlimited Company shows 16 grants in 2022–2024 against only 17 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Medtronic's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Light Field Lab
Light Field Lab, Inc.
64 patents
- Liqui-box
Liqui-Box Corporation
64 patents
- Mc10
Mc10, Inc.
64 patents
- Mechoshade Systems
Mechoshade Systems, LLC
64 patents
- Mitek Systems
Mitek Systems, Inc.
64 patents
- Medshine Discovery
Medshine Discovery Inc.
64 patents
- Meritor Heavy Veh…
Meritor Heavy Vehicle Braking Systems (UK) Limited
64 patents
- Mid-west Metal Pr…
Mid-West Metal Products Company, Inc.
64 patents
- Medtronic Vascula… ◀
Medtronic Vascular Galway Unlimited Company
64 patents
What this shows Medtronic holds 64 patents at rank #5,379, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Medtronic
By rank, the assignees closest to #5,379 in granted patent volume.
- Light Field Lab, Inc. #5,375 · 64 patents
- Liqui-Box Corporation #5,376 · 64 patents
- Mc10, Inc. #5,377 · 64 patents
- Mechoshade Systems, LLC #5,378 · 64 patents
- Mitek Systems, Inc. #5,380 · 64 patents
- Medshine Discovery Inc. #5,381 · 64 patents
- Meritor Heavy Vehicle Braking Systems (UK) Limited #5,382 · 64 patents
- Mid-West Metal Products Company, Inc. #5,383 · 64 patents
Leaders in A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood Vessels)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Medtronic's primary technology class.
- The Procter & Gamble Company 1,426 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 1,101 in class
- Edwards Lifesciences Corporation 1,101 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 851 in class
- Globus Medical, Inc. 752 in class
- Cook Medical Technologies LLC 700 in class
- Smith & Nephew, Inc. 541 in class
- Covidien LP 528 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Medtronic, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood Vessels), Medtronic ranks #98 of 3,082 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (42 here).
Similar claim depth
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (16.6 here).
Medtronic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
42 Top 32% higher than 68% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 | 7.8% |
| 2016 | 11 | 17.2% |
| 2017 | 5 | 7.8% |
| 2018 | 8 | 12.5% |
| 2019 | 8 | 12.5% |
| 2020 | 6 | 9.4% |
| 2021 | 3 | 4.7% |
| 2022 | 7 | 10.9% |
| 2023 | 5 | 7.8% |
| 2024 | 4 | 6.3% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 3.1% |
Which technologies does Medtronic Vascular Galway Unlimited Company patent most?
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Medtronic Vascular Galway Unlimited Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Medtronic Vascular Galway Unlimited Company's lead technology class is A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive Device), 90.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61F
- Ranked #5,381 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Medtronic Vascular Galway Unlimited Company against Light Field Lab, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 41.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.