Medmix Systems AG
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 16 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Medmix ranks #17,888 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 16 patents across 11 technology areas.
- #17,888
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 39th percentile
- by Innovation Score (31.7/100)
- 17.0
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R17888 · Foreign Corporation #17,888 · 16 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 16 grants
- MID-PACK #17,888/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Marel Salmon A/S
- CPC-FOCUS A61B · 11 areas
- INNOV-THIN 31.7/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Marel Salmon A/S (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Medmix’s 31.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Medmix
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Medmix Systems · this assignee 32
Medmix Systems · this assignee
32 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Medmix's Innovation Score is 31.7/100 (39th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Medmix?
Each dot is one of Medmix’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Medmix’s own 17.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Medmix's grants concentrate
Medmix Systems AG is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 68.8% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (8 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Medmix sits between Marel Salmon A/S and Mercer University.
Who files at Medmix's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Marel Salmon A/S
Marel Salmon A/S
16 patents
- Marvel Technology…
Marvel Technology (CHINA) Co., Ltd
16 patents
- Matisa Matériel I…
Matisa Matériel Industriel S.A.
16 patents
- Matroid
Matroid, Inc.
16 patents
- Megvii (Beijing)…
Megvii (BEIJING) Technology Co., Ltd.
16 patents
- Melfas
Melfas Inc.
16 patents
- Mems Drive (Nanji…
Mems Drive (NANJING) Co., Ltd.
16 patents
- Mercer University
Mercer University
16 patents
- Medmix Systems ◀
Medmix Systems AG
16 patents
What this shows Medmix holds 16 patents at rank #17,872, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Medmix
By rank, the assignees closest to #17,872 in granted patent volume.
- Marel Salmon A/S #17,868 · 16 patents
- Marvel Technology (CHINA) Co., Ltd #17,869 · 16 patents
- Matisa Matériel Industriel S.A. #17,870 · 16 patents
- Matroid, Inc. #17,871 · 16 patents
- Megvii (BEIJING) Technology Co., Ltd. #17,873 · 16 patents
- Melfas Inc. #17,874 · 16 patents
- Mems Drive (NANJING) Co., Ltd. #17,875 · 16 patents
- Mercer University #17,876 · 16 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Medmix's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
Medmix's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 39th percentile higher than 39% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 2016 | 5 | 31.3% |
| 2017 | 2 | 12.5% |
| 2018 | 1 | 6.3% |
Which technologies does Medmix Systems AG patent most?
Top 11 of 11 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Medmix Systems AG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Medmix Systems AG's lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 68.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #17,888 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Medmix Systems AG against Marel Salmon A/S, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 31.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.