Overall rank by patents
#36,362
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 5 technology areas, active 2017–2023. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION).
The verdict
Medical holds 7 US patents across 5 technology areas, rank #36,362 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Medical Innovation Developpement has been granted 7 US utility patents between 2017 and 2023, placing Medical Innovation Developpement at rank #36,362 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 5 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 13.7 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION). As a Foreign Corporation, Medical Innovation Developpement is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Medical sits between MDB SRL (7 patents, rank #36,358) and Medigen, Inc. (7 patents, rank #36,366) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 25.0/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 5 grants, compared with 2 in the 2015–2019 window, a +150% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Medical Innovation Developpement's 13.7 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 5 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Medical Innovation Developpement against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
MDB SRL
7 patents
MDS GLOBAL HOLDING PLC
7 patents
MEDAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
7 patents
MEDEOR THERAPEUTICS, INC.
7 patents
MEDICAL INTELLIGENCE MEDIZINTECHNIK GMBH
7 patents
MEDICHEM, S.A.
7 patents
MEDICOM INNOVATION PARTNER A/S
7 patents
MEDIGEN, INC.
7 patents
MEDICAL INNOVATION DEVELOPPEMENT
7 patents
What this shows Medical holds 7 patents at rank #36,362, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,362 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Medical's primary technology class.
Medical's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 Top 84% higher than 16% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2020 | 3 | 42.9% |
| 2021 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 14.3% |
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#36,362
Across all tracked assignees
25.0 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Medical's 7 grants land it in the top 84% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.