Med-Sonics Corp.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Med-sonics ranks #41,619 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #41,619
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 11th percentile
- by Innovation Score (22.9/100)
- 18.7
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R41619 · US Corporation #41,619 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #41,619/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH McLaren Applied
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 2 areas
- INNOV-THIN 22.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: McLaren Applied Technologies Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Med-sonics’s 22.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Med-sonics
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Med-Sonics · this assignee 23
Med-Sonics · this assignee
23 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Med-sonics's Innovation Score is 22.9/100 (11th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Med-sonics?
Each dot is one of Med-sonics’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Med-sonics’s own 18.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Med-sonics's grants concentrate
Med-Sonics Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Med-sonics sits between McLaren Applied Technologies Limited and Medical Enterprises, LLC.
Who files at Med-Sonics's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Mclaren Applied
McLaren Applied Technologies Limited
6 patents
- Mcleanics Technol…
Mcleanics Technology Corporation
6 patents
- Meadwestvaco Calm…
MeadWestvaco Calmar Netherlands BV
6 patents
- Mectron S p A
Mectron S.p.A.
6 patents
- Medregen
MedRegen, LLC
6 patents
- Medialab AI
MediaLab.AI
6 patents
- Medical Design So…
Medical Design Solutions, Inc.
6 patents
- Medical Enterpris…
Medical Enterprises, LLC
6 patents
- Med-sonics ◀
Med-Sonics Corp.
6 patents
What this shows Med-Sonics holds 6 patents at rank #41,715, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Med-Sonics
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,715 in granted patent volume.
- McLaren Applied Technologies Limited #41,711 · 6 patents
- Mcleanics Technology Corporation #41,712 · 6 patents
- MeadWestvaco Calmar Netherlands BV #41,713 · 6 patents
- Mectron S.p.A. #41,714 · 6 patents
- MedRegen, LLC #41,716 · 6 patents
- MediaLab.AI #41,717 · 6 patents
- Medical Design Solutions, Inc. #41,718 · 6 patents
- Medical Enterprises, LLC #41,719 · 6 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Med-Sonics's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
Med-sonics's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 11th percentile higher than 11% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2016 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Med-Sonics Corp. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Med-Sonics Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Med-Sonics Corp.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #41,619 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Med-Sonics Corp. against McLaren Applied Technologies Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 22.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.