Mcleanics Technology Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04M (Telephonic Communication).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Mcleanics ranks #41,613 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #41,613
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 12th percentile
- by Innovation Score (23.5/100)
- 11.3
- avg claims per patent
- -50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R41613 · US Corporation #41,613 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #41,613/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Max Home
- CPC-NARROW H04M · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 23.5/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 11.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Max Home, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Mcleanics’s 23.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Mcleanics
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Mcleanics Technology · this assignee 24
Mcleanics Technology · this assignee
24 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Mcleanics's Innovation Score is 23.5/100 (12th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Mcleanics?
Each dot is one of Mcleanics’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Mcleanics’s own 11.3 claims/patent is at or below the 13.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Mcleanics's grants concentrate
Mcleanics Technology Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under H04M (Telephonic Communication). By volume, Mcleanics sits between Max Home, LLC and MedRegen, LLC.
Who files at Mcleanics's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Max Home
Max Home, LLC
6 patents
- Max-ir Labs Incor…
Max-IR Labs, Incorporated
6 patents
- Maxxwell Motors
Maxxwell Motors, Inc.
6 patents
- Mclaren Applied
McLaren Applied Technologies Limited
6 patents
- Meadwestvaco Calm…
MeadWestvaco Calmar Netherlands BV
6 patents
- Mectron S p A
Mectron S.p.A.
6 patents
- Med-sonics
Med-Sonics Corp.
6 patents
- Medregen
MedRegen, LLC
6 patents
- Mcleanics Technol… ◀
Mcleanics Technology Corporation
6 patents
What this shows Mcleanics holds 6 patents at rank #41,712, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Mcleanics
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,712 in granted patent volume.
- Max Home, LLC #41,708 · 6 patents
- Max-IR Labs, Incorporated #41,709 · 6 patents
- Maxxwell Motors, Inc. #41,710 · 6 patents
- McLaren Applied Technologies Limited #41,711 · 6 patents
- MeadWestvaco Calmar Netherlands BV #41,713 · 6 patents
- Mectron S.p.A. #41,714 · 6 patents
- Med-Sonics Corp. #41,715 · 6 patents
- MedRegen, LLC #41,716 · 6 patents
Leaders in H04M (Telephonic Communication)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Mcleanics's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,133 in class
- Apple Inc. 2,103 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 1,342 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 1,077 in class
- International Business Machines Corporation 999 in class
- Google LLC 969 in class
- AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. 952 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 904 in class
Mcleanics's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
24 12th percentile higher than 12% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2019 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2020 | 2 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does Mcleanics Technology Corporation patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Mcleanics Technology Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Mcleanics Technology Corporation's lead technology class is H04M (Telephonic Communication), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04M
- Ranked #41,613 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Mcleanics Technology Corporation against Max Home, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 23.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.