McLaughlin Group, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 20 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Mclaughlin ranks #14,768 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 20 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #14,768
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 34th percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.4/100)
- 16.4
- avg claims per patent
- -67%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R14768 · US Corporation #14,768 · 20 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 20 grants
- MID-PACK #14,768/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Manus Bio
- CPC-NARROW E02F · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.4/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -67% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Manus Bio Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Mclaughlin’s 30.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Mclaughlin
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- McLaughlin Group · this assignee 30
McLaughlin Group · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Mclaughlin's Innovation Score is 30.4/100 (34th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Mclaughlin?
Each dot is one of Mclaughlin’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Mclaughlin’s own 16.4 claims/patent is at or below the 18.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Mclaughlin's grants concentrate
McLaughlin Group, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Mclaughlin sits between Manus Bio Inc. and MicroContinuum, Inc..
Who files at McLaughlin's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Manus Bio
Manus Bio Inc.
20 patents
- Manyworlds
ManyWorlds, Inc.
20 patents
- Marchex
Marchex, Inc.
20 patents
- Mary Elle Fashions
Mary Elle Fashions, Inc.
20 patents
- Medallion Therape…
Medallion Therapeutics, Inc.
20 patents
- Melior Innovations
Melior Innovations, Inc.
20 patents
- Metabasis Therape…
Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc.
20 patents
- Microcontinuum
MicroContinuum, Inc.
20 patents
- Mclaughlin Group ◀
McLaughlin Group, Inc.
20 patents
What this shows McLaughlin holds 20 patents at rank #14,776, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near McLaughlin
By rank, the assignees closest to #14,776 in granted patent volume.
- Manus Bio Inc. #14,772 · 20 patents
- ManyWorlds, Inc. #14,773 · 20 patents
- Marchex, Inc. #14,774 · 20 patents
- Mary Elle Fashions, Inc. #14,775 · 20 patents
- Medallion Therapeutics, Inc. #14,777 · 20 patents
- Melior Innovations, Inc. #14,778 · 20 patents
- Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc. #14,779 · 20 patents
- MicroContinuum, Inc. #14,780 · 20 patents
Leaders in E02F (Dredging)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in McLaughlin's primary technology class.
- Caterpillar Inc. 1,041 in class
- Komatsu Ltd. 910 in class
- Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. 595 in class
- Deere & Company 487 in class
- Kubota Corporation 320 in class
- Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd 250 in class
- Volvo Construction Equipment AB 198 in class
- CNH Industrial America LLC 178 in class
Mclaughlin's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 34th percentile higher than 34% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 5.0% |
| 2016 | 4 | 20.0% |
| 2017 | 3 | 15.0% |
| 2018 | 3 | 15.0% |
| 2019 | 4 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 5 | 25.0% |
Which technologies does McLaughlin Group, Inc. patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
McLaughlin Group, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- McLaughlin Group, Inc.'s lead technology class is E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E02F
- Ranked #14,768 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare McLaughlin Group, Inc. against Manus Bio Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.