Maxell Izumi Co., Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Maxell ranks #20,058 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #20,058
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 38th percentile
- by Innovation Score (31.6/100)
- 5.9
- avg claims per patent
- +400%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R20058 · Foreign Corporation #20,058 · 14 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
- MID-PACK #20,058/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Marine Town
- CPC-NARROW B26B · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 31.6/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 5.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +400% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Marine Town Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Maxell’s 31.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Maxell
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Maxell Izumi · this assignee 32
Maxell Izumi · this assignee
32 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Maxell's Innovation Score is 31.6/100 (38th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Maxell?
Each dot is one of Maxell’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Maxell’s own 5.9 claims/patent is at or below the 11.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Maxell's grants concentrate
Maxell Izumi Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 71.4% of grants classified under B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (5 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2019. By volume, Maxell sits between Marine Town Inc. and Mccloskey International Limited.
Maxell's three-year grant acceleration
Maxell Izumi Co., Ltd. shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Maxell's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Marine Town
Marine Town Inc.
14 patents
- Martur Italy S R L
Martur Italy S.R.L.
14 patents
- Matco Tools
Matco Tools Corporation
14 patents
- Mathys Bettlach
Mathys AG Bettlach
14 patents
- Maxon Internation…
Maxon International AG
14 patents
- Maxton Engineering
Maxton Engineering Ltd.
14 patents
- Mayeaux Holding
Mayeaux Holding, LLC
14 patents
- Mccloskey Interna…
Mccloskey International Limited
14 patents
- Maxell Izumi ◀
Maxell Izumi Co., Ltd.
14 patents
What this shows Maxell holds 14 patents at rank #20,042, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Maxell
By rank, the assignees closest to #20,042 in granted patent volume.
- Marine Town Inc. #20,038 · 14 patents
- Martur Italy S.R.L. #20,039 · 14 patents
- Matco Tools Corporation #20,040 · 14 patents
- Mathys AG Bettlach #20,041 · 14 patents
- Maxon International AG #20,043 · 14 patents
- Maxton Engineering Ltd. #20,044 · 14 patents
- Mayeaux Holding, LLC #20,045 · 14 patents
- Mccloskey International Limited #20,046 · 14 patents
Leaders in B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Maxell's primary technology class.
Maxell's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 38th percentile higher than 38% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 14.3% |
| 2021 | 3 | 21.4% |
| 2022 | 5 | 35.7% |
| 2024 | 2 | 14.3% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does Maxell Izumi Co., Ltd. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Maxell Izumi Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Maxell Izumi Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 71.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B26B
- Ranked #20,058 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Maxell Izumi Co., Ltd. against Marine Town Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 31.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.