Where does Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc. ranks #48,596 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc. hold?

Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc. holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2019, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 24.2 out of 100 (14th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc. focus on?

Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc.'s top technology area is A46B (Brushes) with 5 patents, ranking #57 of 322 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

Is Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc.'s patents?

Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc.'s patents average 14.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A46B (Brushes).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Matthew ranks #48,596 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 7 technology areas.

#48,596
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 14th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.2/100): 14.4
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R48596 · US Corporation #48,596 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #48,596/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Mate Precision
CPC-NARROW A46B · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 24.2/100
CLAIMS-RICH 14.4 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Mate Precision Technologies Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Matthew’s 24.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (26%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 9.4 pts (39%) Claim depth 8.6 pts (36%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Matthew Rolston… · this assignee

24
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Matthew's Innovation Score is 24.2/100 (14th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Matthew?

Each dot is one of Matthew’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Matthew’s own 14.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Matthew vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Matthew's grants concentrate

Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A46B (Brushes). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Matthew sits between Mate Precision Technologies Inc. and Mazzei Injector Company LLC.

Mate Precision

5
Materials Technol…

5
Mathmos

5
Matternet

5
Maugus Manufactur…

5
Maven Wireless Sw…

5
Maxor National Ph…

5
Mazzei Injector

5
Matthew Rolston P… ◀

5

What this shows Matthew holds 5 patents at rank #48,785, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Matthew

By rank, the assignees closest to #48,785 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A46B (Brushes)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Matthew's primary technology class.

Matthew's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 14th percentile higher than 14% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	4	80.0%
2019	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc. patent most?

A46B - Brushes 5

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 5

G03B - Apparatus OR Arrangements FOR Taking Photographs OR FOR Projecting OR Viewing THEM; Apparatus OR Arrangements Employing Analogous Techniques Using Waves Other Than Optical WAVES; Accessories Therefor 4

A45D - Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring 4

F21V - Functional Features OR Details OF Lighting Devices OR Systems THEREOF; Structural Combinations OF Lighting Devices With Other Articles, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

F21Y - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses F21k, F21l, F21s and F21v, Relating TO THE Form OR THE Kind OF THE Light Sources OR OF THE Colour OF THE Light Emitted 3

F21W - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses F21k, F21l, F21s and F21v, Relating TO Uses OR Applications OF Lighting Devices OR Systems 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc.'s lead technology class is A46B (Brushes), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A46B
Ranked #48,596 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Matthew Rolston Photographer, Inc. against Mate Precision Technologies Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 24.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.