Where does Marty Gilman, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Marty Gilman, Inc. ranks #12,109 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Marty Gilman, Inc. hold?

Marty Gilman, Inc. holds 25 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is Marty Gilman, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Marty Gilman, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 31.6 out of 100 (38th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Marty Gilman, Inc. focus on?

Marty Gilman, Inc.'s top technology area is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment) with 12 patents, ranking #104 of 1,021 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is Marty Gilman, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Marty Gilman, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -23% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Marty Gilman, Inc.'s patents?

Marty Gilman, Inc.'s patents average 7.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Marty Gilman, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Marty Gilman, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 25 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Marty ranks #12,109 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 25 patents across 5 technology areas.

#12,109
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 38th percentile
by Innovation Score (31.6/100): 7.3
avg claims per patent: -23%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R12109 · US Corporation #12,109 · 25 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 25 grants
UPPER-Q #12,109/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH MediGuide
CPC-NARROW A63B · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 31.6/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.3 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -23% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: MediGuide Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Marty’s 31.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.3 pts (36%) Velocity 8.0 pts (25%) Breadth 7.9 pts (25%) Claim depth 4.4 pts (14%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Astora Women's Health · near

32
Carpenter Technology · near

32
Gilead Connecticut · near

32
Marty Gilman · this assignee

32
WaterGuru · near

32
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Marty's Innovation Score is 31.6/100 (38th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Marty?

Each dot is one of Marty’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Marty’s own 7.3 claims/patent is at or below the 13.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Marty vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Marty's grants concentrate

Marty Gilman, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 48% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Marty sits between Minnetronix, Inc. and Minelab Electronics Pty. Limited.

Marty's three-year grant acceleration

Marty Gilman, Inc. shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Minnetronix

25
Mitsubishi Alumin…

25
MU Ionic Solutions

25
Multivac Sepp Hag…

25
Mediguide

25
Merry

25
Micron

25
Minelab Pty

25
Marty Gilman ◀

25

What this shows Marty holds 25 patents at rank #12,118, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Marty

By rank, the assignees closest to #12,118 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Marty's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Marty, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training), Marty ranks #104 of 1,021 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (32 here).

Gilead Connecticut, Inc. 32 Carpenter Technology Corporation 32 WaterGuru, Inc. 32 Astora Women's Health, LLC 32

Marty's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

32 38th percentile higher than 38% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Marty Gilman, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	4	16.0%
2016	5	20.0%
2017	3	12.0%
2019	1	4.0%
2020	2	8.0%
2021	2	8.0%
2022	1	4.0%
2023	1	4.0%
2024	4	16.0%
2025partial year	2	8.0%

Which technologies does Marty Gilman, Inc. patent most?

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 12

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 2

G09B - Educational OR Demonstration APPLIANCES; Appliances FOR Teaching, OR Communicating With, THE Blind, Deaf OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; Diagrams 1

G09F - DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals 1

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Marty Gilman, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Marty Gilman, Inc.'s lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 48% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
Ranked #12,109 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Marty Gilman, Inc. against Minnetronix, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 31.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.