Where does Marketing Impact Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Marketing Impact Limited ranks #32,428 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Marketing Impact Limited hold?

Marketing Impact Limited holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2021, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is Marketing Impact Limited's Innovation Score?

Marketing Impact Limited has an Innovation Score of 26.1 out of 100 (19th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Marketing Impact Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Marketing Impact Limited's recent grant velocity is -40% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Marketing Impact Limited's patents?

Marketing Impact Limited's patents average 17.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Marketing Impact Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Marketing Impact Limited

Q: What technology areas does Marketing Impact Limited focus on?

Marketing Impact Limited's top technology area is A47F (Special Furniture, Fittings, OR Accessories FOR Shops, Storehouses, Bars, Restaurants OR THE LIKE; Paying Counters) with 8 patents, ranking #49 of 482 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47F (Special Furniture, Fittings, OR Accessories FOR Shops, Storehouses, Bars, Restaurants OR THE LIKE; Paying Counters).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Marketing ranks #32,428 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 5 technology areas.

#32,428
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 19th percentile
by Innovation Score (26.1/100): 17.6
avg claims per patent: -40%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R32428 · Foreign Corporation #32,428 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #32,428/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Maidbot
CPC-NARROW A47F · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 26.1/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.6 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DOWN -40% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Maidbot, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Marketing’s 26.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (29%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 7.9 pts (30%) Claim depth 10.6 pts (41%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Marketing Impact · this assignee

26
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Marketing's Innovation Score is 26.1/100 (19th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Marketing?

Each dot is one of Marketing’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Marketing’s own 17.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 8.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Marketing vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Marketing's grants concentrate

Marketing Impact Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A47F (Special Furniture, Fittings, OR Accessories FOR Shops, Storehouses, Bars, Restaurants OR THE LIKE; Paying Counters). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Marketing sits between Maidbot, Inc. and Maruho Medical, Inc..

Maidbot

8
Manchester Copper…

8
Maranon

8
Marine Acquisitio…

8
Marlabs Incorpora…

8
Marlin Gas Servic…

8
Martin Audio

8
Maruho Medical

8
Marketing Impact ◀

8

What this shows Marketing holds 8 patents at rank #32,489, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Marketing

By rank, the assignees closest to #32,489 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A47F (Special Furniture)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Marketing's primary technology class.

Marketing's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

26 19th percentile higher than 19% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Marketing Impact Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	4	50.0%
2017	1	12.5%
2020	1	12.5%
2021	2	25.0%

Which technologies does Marketing Impact Limited patent most?

A47F - Special Furniture, Fittings, OR Accessories FOR Shops, Storehouses, Bars, Restaurants OR THE LIKE; Paying Counters 8

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 4

B61F - Rail Vehicle Suspensions, e.g. Underframes, Bogies OR Arrangements OF Wheel AXLES; Rail Vehicles FOR USE ON Tracks OF Different WIDTH; Preventing Derailing OF Rail VEHICLES; Wheel Guards, Obstruction Removers OR THE Like FOR Rail Vehicles 4

B61C - LOCOMOTIVES; Motor Railcars 4

G07F - Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Marketing Impact Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Marketing Impact Limited's lead technology class is A47F (Special Furniture, Fittings, OR Accessories FOR Shops, Storehouses, Bars, Restaurants OR THE LIKE; Paying Counters), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47F
Ranked #32,428 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Marketing Impact Limited against Maidbot, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 26.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.