Where does MAG Daddy LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), MAG Daddy LLC ranks #41,538 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does MAG Daddy LLC hold?

MAG Daddy LLC holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2023, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is MAG Daddy LLC's Innovation Score?

MAG Daddy LLC has an Innovation Score of 46.8 out of 100 (top 20% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is MAG Daddy LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for MAG Daddy LLC.

What does claim depth mean for MAG Daddy LLC's patents?

MAG Daddy LLC's patents average 20.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the MAG Daddy LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

MAG Daddy LLC

Q: What technology areas does MAG Daddy LLC focus on?

MAG Daddy LLC's top technology area is F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing) with 5 patents, ranking #258 of 2,095 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, MAG ranks #41,538 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 5 technology areas.

#41,538
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 20%
by Innovation Score (46.8/100): 20.3
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R41538 · US Corporation #41,538 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #41,538/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Maeda Seisakusho
CPC-NARROW F16B · 5 areas
INNOV-PAR 46.8/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 20.3 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2020–2023 · 4y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Maeda Seisakusho Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How MAG’s 46.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (14%) Velocity 20.0 pts (43%) Breadth 7.9 pts (17%) Claim depth 12.2 pts (26%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
MAG Daddy · this assignee

47
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows MAG's Innovation Score is 46.8/100 (top 20% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for MAG?

Each dot is one of MAG’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). MAG’s own 20.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

MAG vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where MAG's grants concentrate

MAG Daddy LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, MAG sits between Maeda Seisakusho Co., Ltd. and Magna-sonic Stress Testers Inc..

MAG's three-year grant acceleration

MAG Daddy LLC shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Maeda Seisakusho

6
Maersk Supply Ser…

6
Maestro Internati…

6
Maftec

6
Magen ECO Energy…

6
Magna Auteca

6
Magna BDW

6
Magna-sonic Stres…

6
MAG Daddy ◀

6

What this shows MAG holds 6 patents at rank #41,506, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near MAG

By rank, the assignees closest to #41,506 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in MAG's primary technology class.

MAG's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

47 Top 20% higher than 80% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

MAG Daddy LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	1	16.7%
2022	1	16.7%
2023	4	66.7%

Which technologies does MAG Daddy LLC patent most?

F16B - Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing 5

F16L - PIPES; Joints OR Fittings FOR PIPES; Supports FOR Pipes, Cables OR Protective TUBING; Means FOR Thermal Insulation IN General 4

H01R - Electrically-conductive CONNECTIONS; Structural Associations OF A Plurality OF Mutually-insulated Electrical Connecting ELEMENTS; Coupling DEVICES; Current Collectors 1

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

H02G - Installation OF Electric Cables OR Lines, OR OF Combined Optical AND Electric Cables OR Lines 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

MAG Daddy LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

MAG Daddy LLC's lead technology class is F16B (Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16B
Ranked #41,538 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare MAG Daddy LLC against Maeda Seisakusho Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 46.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.