Madgrip Holdings, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B29L (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Madgrip ranks #32,404 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #32,404
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 16th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.8/100)
- 16.9
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R32404 · US Corporation #32,404 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #32,404/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH M3dicine IP PTY
- CPC-NARROW B29L · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: M3dicine IP PTY Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Madgrip’s 24.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Madgrip
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Madgrip Holdings · this assignee 25
Madgrip Holdings · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Madgrip's Innovation Score is 24.8/100 (16th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Madgrip?
Each dot is one of Madgrip’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Madgrip’s own 16.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Madgrip's grants concentrate
Madgrip Holdings, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 75% of grants classified under B29L (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (3 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Madgrip sits between M.I. Tech Co., Ltd. and Make Sence, Inc..
Who files at Madgrip's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- M I Tech
M.I. Tech Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- M3dicine IP PTY
M3dicine IP PTY Ltd.
8 patents
- MA Aluminum
MA Aluminum Corporation
8 patents
- Macbo
Macbo Technologies LLC
8 patents
- MAF Agrobotic
MAF Agrobotic
8 patents
- Magforce
Magforce AG
8 patents
- Magna Industries
Magna Industries, Inc.
8 patents
- Make Sence
Make Sence, Inc.
8 patents
- Madgrip Holdings ◀
Madgrip Holdings, LLC
8 patents
What this shows Madgrip holds 8 patents at rank #32,390, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Madgrip
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,390 in granted patent volume.
- M.I. Tech Co., Ltd. #32,386 · 8 patents
- M3dicine IP PTY Ltd. #32,387 · 8 patents
- MA Aluminum Corporation #32,388 · 8 patents
- Macbo Technologies LLC #32,389 · 8 patents
- MAF Agrobotic #32,391 · 8 patents
- Magforce AG #32,392 · 8 patents
- Magna Industries, Inc. #32,393 · 8 patents
- Make Sence, Inc. #32,394 · 8 patents
Leaders in B29L (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Madgrip's primary technology class.
Madgrip's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 16th percentile higher than 16% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2017 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2019 | 3 | 37.5% |
Which technologies does Madgrip Holdings, LLC patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Madgrip Holdings, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Madgrip Holdings, LLC's lead technology class is B29L (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles), 75% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B29L
- Ranked #32,404 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Madgrip Holdings, LLC against M.I. Tech Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.