M3dicine IP PTY Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, M3dicine ranks #32,398 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #32,398
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 7th percentile
- by Innovation Score (20.5/100)
- 15.6
- avg claims per patent
- +200%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R32398 · Foreign Corporation #32,398 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #32,398/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Luxer
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 1 areas
- INNOV-THIN 20.5/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +200% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Luxer Corporation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How M3dicine’s 20.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around M3dicine
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- M3dicine IP PTY · this assignee 21
M3dicine IP PTY · this assignee
21 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows M3dicine's Innovation Score is 20.5/100 (7th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for M3dicine?
Each dot is one of M3dicine’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). M3dicine’s own 15.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where M3dicine's grants concentrate
M3dicine IP PTY Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 75% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2019. By volume, M3dicine sits between Luxer Corporation and MAF Agrobotic.
Who files at M3dicine's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Luxer
Luxer Corporation
8 patents
- M Group
M Group, Inc.
8 patents
- M&M Machinery Ser…
M&M Machinery Services, Inc.
8 patents
- M I Tech
M.I. Tech Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- MA Aluminum
MA Aluminum Corporation
8 patents
- Macbo
Macbo Technologies LLC
8 patents
- Madgrip Holdings
Madgrip Holdings, LLC
8 patents
- MAF Agrobotic
MAF Agrobotic
8 patents
- M3dicine IP PTY ◀
M3dicine IP PTY Ltd.
8 patents
What this shows M3dicine holds 8 patents at rank #32,387, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near M3dicine
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,387 in granted patent volume.
- Luxer Corporation #32,383 · 8 patents
- M Group, Inc. #32,384 · 8 patents
- M&M Machinery Services, Inc. #32,385 · 8 patents
- M.I. Tech Co., Ltd. #32,386 · 8 patents
- MA Aluminum Corporation #32,388 · 8 patents
- Macbo Technologies LLC #32,389 · 8 patents
- Madgrip Holdings, LLC #32,390 · 8 patents
- MAF Agrobotic #32,391 · 8 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in M3dicine's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
M3dicine's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
21 7th percentile higher than 7% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2020 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 2021 | 2 | 25.0% |
Which technologies does M3dicine IP PTY Ltd. patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
M3dicine IP PTY Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- M3dicine IP PTY Ltd.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 75% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #32,398 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare M3dicine IP PTY Ltd. against Luxer Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 20.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.