Overall rank by patents
#48,468
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 7 technology areas, active 2016–2017. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61H (PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFI).
The verdict
Lite holds 5 US patents across 7 technology areas, rank #48,468 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Lite Run, Inc. has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2016 and 2017, placing Lite Run, Inc. at rank #48,468 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 7 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 55.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61H (PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFI). As a US Corporation, Lite Run, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Lite sits between Linwood Resources, Llc (5 patents, rank #48,464) and Little Kids, Inc. (5 patents, rank #48,472) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 30.5/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 5 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Lite Run, Inc.'s 55.2 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while concentration in 7 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Lite Run, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Linwood Resources, LLC
5 patents
Lion Copolymers Holdings, LLC
5 patents
Lionel LLC
5 patents
Lite Guard Safety Solutions Pty.
5 patents
Litech Laboratories, Inc.
5 patents
Lithium Energy and Power GmbH & Co. KG
5 patents
Litrinium, Inc.
5 patents
Little Kids, Inc.
5 patents
Lite Run, Inc.
5 patents
What this shows Lite holds 5 patents at rank #48,468, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,468 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lite's primary technology class.
Lite's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 Top 65% higher than 35% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2017 | 3 | 60.0% |
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#48,468
Across all tracked assignees
30.5 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Lite's 5 grants land it in the top 65% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.