Lilitab LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 15 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16M (Frames, Casings OR Beds OF Engines, Machines OR Apparatus, NOT Specific TO Engines, Machines OR Apparatus Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; Supports).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Lilitab ranks #18,845 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 15 patents across 12 technology areas.
- #18,845
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 34th percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.3/100)
- 14.1
- avg claims per patent
- -93%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R18845 · US Corporation #18,845 · 15 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 15 grants
- MID-PACK #18,845/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH LeapYear
- CPC-FOCUS F16M · 12 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -93% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: LeapYear Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Lilitab’s 30.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Lilitab
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Lilitab · this assignee 30
Lilitab · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Lilitab's Innovation Score is 30.3/100 (34th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Lilitab?
Each dot is one of Lilitab’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Lilitab’s own 14.1 claims/patent is at or below the 16.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Lilitab's grants concentrate
Lilitab LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 46.7% of grants classified under F16M (Frames, Casings OR Beds OF Engines, Machines OR Apparatus, NOT Specific TO Engines, Machines OR Apparatus Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; Supports). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Lilitab sits between LeapYear Technologies, Inc. and Litetronics International, Inc..
Who files at Lilitab's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Leapyear
LeapYear Technologies, Inc.
15 patents
- Lechler
Lechler GmbH
15 patents
- Leibniz-institut…
Leibniz-Institut für Festkörper- und, Werkstoffforschung Dresden e. V.
15 patents
- Lifetouch
Lifetouch Inc.
15 patents
- Linden Research
Linden Research, Inc.
15 patents
- Lindsey Adelman S…
Lindsey Adelman Studio LLC
15 patents
- Lineweight
Lineweight LLC
15 patents
- Litetronics Inter…
Litetronics International, Inc.
15 patents
- Lilitab ◀
Lilitab LLC
15 patents
What this shows Lilitab holds 15 patents at rank #18,853, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Lilitab
By rank, the assignees closest to #18,853 in granted patent volume.
- LeapYear Technologies, Inc. #18,849 · 15 patents
- Lechler GmbH #18,850 · 15 patents
- Leibniz-Institut für Festkörper- und, Werkstoffforschung Dresden e. V. #18,851 · 15 patents
- Lifetouch Inc. #18,852 · 15 patents
- Linden Research, Inc. #18,854 · 15 patents
- Lindsey Adelman Studio LLC #18,855 · 15 patents
- Lineweight LLC #18,856 · 15 patents
- Litetronics International, Inc. #18,857 · 15 patents
Leaders in F16M (Frames)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lilitab's primary technology class.
Lilitab's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 34th percentile higher than 34% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 26.7% |
| 2016 | 3 | 20.0% |
| 2017 | 5 | 33.3% |
| 2019 | 2 | 13.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 6.7% |
Which technologies does Lilitab LLC patent most?
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Lilitab LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Lilitab LLC's lead technology class is F16M (Frames, Casings OR Beds OF Engines, Machines OR Apparatus, NOT Specific TO Engines, Machines OR Apparatus Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; Supports), 46.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16M
- Ranked #18,845 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Lilitab LLC against LeapYear Technologies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.