Overall rank by patents
#41,433
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 9 technology areas, active 2023–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: H02P (CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS).
The verdict
Lenze holds 6 US patents across 9 technology areas, rank #41,433 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Lenze SE has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2023 and 2025, placing Lenze SE at rank #41,433 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 9 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 8.3 claims per patent with primary concentration in H02P (CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS). As a Foreign Corporation, Lenze SE is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Lenze sits between Leishen Intelligent System Co., Ltd. (6 patents, rank #41,429) and Lex Submersible Pumps FZE (6 patents, rank #41,437) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 42.3/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2023 through 2025, with 6 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Lenze SE's 8.3 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 9 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Lenze SE against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Leishen Intelligent System Co., Ltd.
6 patents
Leman Micro Devices SA
6 patents
LenovoEMC Limited
6 patents
Lenz Therapeutics, Inc.
6 patents
Leo Schachter Diamonds, L.L.C.
6 patents
Levicept LTD
6 patents
Lewis Bolt & Nut Company
6 patents
Lex Submersible Pumps FZE
6 patents
Lenze SE
6 patents
What this shows Lenze holds 6 patents at rank #41,433, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,433 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lenze's primary technology class.
Lenze's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
42 Top 31% higher than 69% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2024 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2025 | 2 | 33.3% |
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#41,433
Across all tracked assignees
42.3 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Lenze's 6 grants land it in the top 31% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.