Overall rank by patents
#48,321
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G08B (Signalling OR Calling SYSTEMS; Order TELEGRAPHS; Alarm Systems).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Leeb ranks #48,321 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 10 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R48321 · US Corporation #48,321 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: LDL Technology (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Ada-es · near
46 score
Infinity Pharmaceuti… · near
46 score
Leeb Innovations · this assignee
46 score
OMS Investments · near
46 score
Sarepta Therapeutics · near
46 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Leeb's Innovation Score is 46.1/100 (top 22% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Leeb Innovations, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under G08B (Signalling OR Calling SYSTEMS; Order TELEGRAPHS; Alarm Systems). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Leeb sits between LDL Technology and Leica Microsystems NC, Inc..
Leeb Innovations, LLC shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
LDL Technology
5 patents
Leader Engineering-fabrication, Inc.
5 patents
Lecavalier Cellars LLC
5 patents
LEDdynamics, Inc.
5 patents
Legrand Connectrac
5 patents
Legupro AB
5 patents
Leica Biosystems Newcastle Ltd
5 patents
Leica Microsystems NC, Inc.
5 patents
Leeb Innovations, LLC
5 patents
What this shows Leeb holds 5 patents at rank #48,299, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,299 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Leeb's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Leeb, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (46 here).
Leeb's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
46 Top 22% higher than 78% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2023 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2024 | 2 | 40.0% |
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#48,321
of 49,997 tracked assignees
46.1 out of 100
What to do with this data
Leeb Innovations, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.