Where does Lashify, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Lashify, Inc. ranks #4,010 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Lashify, Inc. hold?

Lashify, Inc. holds 90 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2025, spanning 12 technology areas.

What is Lashify, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Lashify, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 52.7 out of 100 (top 10% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Lashify, Inc. focus on?

Lashify, Inc.'s top technology area is A41G (Artificial FLOWERS; WIGS; MASKS; Feathers) with 28 patents, ranking #2 of 37 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 12 CPC subclasses total.

Is Lashify, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Lashify, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +1220% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Lashify, Inc.'s patents?

Lashify, Inc.'s patents average 8.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Lashify, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Lashify, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 90 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A41G (Artificial FLOWERS; WIGS; MASKS; Feathers).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Lashify ranks #4,010 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 90 patents across 12 technology areas.

#4,010
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 10%
by Innovation Score (52.7/100): 8.1
avg claims per patent: +1220%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R4010 · US Corporation #4,010 · 90 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 90 grants
TOP-DECILE #4,010/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Hodogaya Chemical
CPC-FOCUS A41G · 12 areas
INNOV-PAR 52.7/100
CLAIMS-PAR 8.1 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +1220% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Hodogaya Chemical Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Lashify’s 52.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 15.6 pts (30%) Velocity 20.0 pts (38%) Breadth 12.2 pts (23%) Claim depth 4.9 pts (9%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Kapsch TrafficCom · near

53
ABB Power Grids… · near

53
Genetec · near

53
Laboratoires Bodycad · near

53
Lashify · this assignee

53
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Lashify's Innovation Score is 52.7/100 (top 10% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Lashify?

Each dot is one of Lashify’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Lashify’s own 8.1 claims/patent is at or below the 10.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Lashify vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Lashify's grants concentrate

Lashify, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 31.1% of grants classified under A41G (Artificial FLOWERS; WIGS; MASKS; Feathers). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (23 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Lashify sits between Hodogaya Chemical Co., Ltd. and Musco Corporation.

Lashify's three-year grant acceleration

Lashify, Inc. shows 58 grants in 2022–2024 against only 12 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Hodogaya Chemical

90
Kobayashi Pharmac…

90
Liebherr-werk Ehi…

90
Lixil

90
Medacta Internati…

90
Mirise

90
Mckesson

90
Musco

90
Lashify ◀

90

What this shows Lashify holds 90 patents at rank #4,012, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Lashify

By rank, the assignees closest to #4,012 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A41G (Artificial Flowers)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lashify's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Lashify, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A41G (Artificial Flowers), Lashify ranks #2 of 37 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (53 here).

ABB Power Grids Switzerland AG 53 Genetec Inc. 53 Laboratoires Bodycad Inc. 53 Kapsch TrafficCom AG 53

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (8.1 here).

Zhejiang University OF Technology 8.1 avg Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. 8.1 avg Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd 8.1 avg Teac Corporation 8.1 avg

Lashify's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

53 Top 10% higher than 90% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Lashify, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	1	1.1%
2019	4	4.4%
2020	6	6.7%
2021	2	2.2%
2022	15	16.7%
2023	20	22.2%
2024	23	25.6%
2025partial year	19	21.1%

Which technologies does Lashify, Inc. patent most?

A41G - Artificial FLOWERS; WIGS; MASKS; Feathers 28

A45D - Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring 13

B25B - Tools OR Bench Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, FOR Fastening, Connecting, Disengaging OR Holding 11

A45C - PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags 10

B65D - Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR Fittings THEREFOR; Packaging ELEMENTS; Packages 10

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 3

A61Q - Specific USE OF Cosmetics OR Similar Toiletry Preparations 3

A61K - Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes 3

C09J - ADHESIVES; Non-mechanical Aspects OF Adhesive Processes IN GENERAL; Adhesive Processes NOT Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF Materials AS Adhesives 3

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 2

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 2

A41F - Garment FASTENINGS; Suspenders 1

Top 12 of 12 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Lashify, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Lashify, Inc.'s lead technology class is A41G (Artificial FLOWERS; WIGS; MASKS; Feathers), 31.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A41G
Ranked #4,010 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Lashify, Inc. against Hodogaya Chemical Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 52.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.