Overall rank by patents
#4,012
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 90 granted patents across 12 technology areas, active 2018–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A41G (ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS; WIGS; MASKS; FEATHERS).
The verdict
Lashify holds 90 US patents across 12 technology areas, rank #4,012 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Lashify, Inc. has been granted 90 US utility patents between 2018 and 2025, placing Lashify, Inc. at rank #4,012 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 12 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 8.1 claims per patent with primary concentration in A41G (ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS; WIGS; MASKS; FEATHERS). As a US Corporation, Lashify, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Lashify sits between Hodogaya Chemical Co., Ltd. (90 patents, rank #4,008) and Musco Corporation (90 patents, rank #4,016) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 52.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 85 grants, compared with 5 in the 2015–2019 window, a +1600% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Lashify, Inc.'s 8.1 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 12 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Lashify, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Hodogaya Chemical Co., Ltd.
90 patents
Kobayashi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
90 patents
LIEBHERR-WERK EHINGEN GMBH
90 patents
LIXIL CORPORATION
90 patents
MEDACTA INTERNATIONAL SA
90 patents
MIRISE Technologies Corporation
90 patents
McKesson Corporation
90 patents
Musco Corporation
90 patents
Lashify, Inc.
90 patents
What this shows Lashify holds 90 patents at rank #4,012, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #4,012 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lashify's primary technology class.
Lashify's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
53 Top 10% higher than 90% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 1.1% |
| 2019 | 4 | 4.4% |
| 2020 | 6 | 6.7% |
| 2021 | 2 | 2.2% |
| 2022 | 15 | 16.7% |
| 2023 | 20 | 22.2% |
| 2024 | 23 | 25.6% |
| 2025 | 19 | 21.1% |
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#4,012
Across all tracked assignees
52.7 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Lashify's 90 grants land it in the top 10% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.