Where does Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc. ranks #24,684 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc. hold?

Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc. holds 11 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2025, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 51.3 out of 100 (top 12% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc. focus on?

Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc.'s top technology area is G01R (Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables) with 8 patents, ranking #610 of 3,424 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

Is Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +200% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc.'s patents?

Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc.'s patents average 23.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01R (Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Lake ranks #24,684 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 6 technology areas.

#24,684
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 12%
by Innovation Score (51.3/100): 23.4
avg claims per patent: +200%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R24684 · US Corporation #24,684 · 11 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
MID-PACK #24,684/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Lambda:4 Entwicklungen
CPC-NARROW G01R · 6 areas
INNOV-PAR 51.3/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 23.4 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +200% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Lambda:4 Entwicklungen GmbH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Lake’s 51.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.6 pts (17%) Velocity 20.0 pts (39%) Breadth 8.7 pts (17%) Claim depth 14.1 pts (27%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Lake Shore Cryotronics · this assignee

51
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Lake's Innovation Score is 51.3/100 (top 12% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Lake?

Each dot is one of Lake’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Lake’s own 23.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Lake vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Lake's grants concentrate

Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 72.7% of grants classified under G01R (Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Lake sits between Louis Garneau Sports Inc. and Lemi Technology, LLC.

Lake's three-year grant acceleration

Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc. shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Louis Garneau Spo…

11
LPE S P A

11
Luxul Technolocy…

11
Lanova Medicines

11
Lambda:4 Entwickl…

11
Laminated Film

11
Lehigh Defense

11
Lemi Technology

11
Lake Shore Cryotr… ◀

11

What this shows Lake holds 11 patents at rank #24,699, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Lake

By rank, the assignees closest to #24,699 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G01R (Measuring Electric Variables)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lake's primary technology class.

Lake's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

51 Top 12% higher than 88% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	1	9.1%
2018	1	9.1%
2023	3	27.3%
2024	3	27.3%
2025partial year	3	27.3%

Which technologies does Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc. patent most?

G01R - Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables 8

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 6

H03G - Control OF Amplification 6

H03M - CODING; DECODING; Code Conversion IN General 6

H03F - Amplifiers 6

H10N - Electric Solid-state Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc.'s lead technology class is G01R (Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables), 72.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01R
Ranked #24,684 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc. against Louis Garneau Sports Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 51.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.