USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

KWS Saat SE

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 25 granted patents across 13 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A01H (NEW Plants OR ; NON-TRANSGENIC; Processes FOR Obtaining THEM; Plant Reproduction BY Tissue Culture Techniques).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, KWS ranks #12,081 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 25 patents across 13 technology areas.

#12,081
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 39%
by Innovation Score (39.0/100)
28.2
avg claims per patent
-61%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R12081 · Foreign Corporation #12,081 · 25 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 25 grants
  • UPPER-Q #12,081/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Kobe Seiko Sho…
  • CPC-FOCUS A01H · 13 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 39.0/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 28.2 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -61% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho (Kobe Steel, Ltd.) (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How KWS’s 39.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around KWS

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows KWS's Innovation Score is 39.0/100 (top 39% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for KWS?

Each dot is one of KWS’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). KWS’s own 28.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 6.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

KWS vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 24.924.92525.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Kimura Kohki Co., Ltd. - 25, 2.88Kimura KohkiKlean Kanteen, Inc. - 25, 3.8Klean KanteenKorea GAS Corporation - 25, 12.4Korea GASKumho Tire Co., Inc. - 25, 5.84Kumho TireKabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho (Kobe Steel, Ltd.) - 25, 11.04Kobe Seiko Sho (K…Kanto Kagaku Kabushiki Kaisha - 25, 9.12Kanto KagakuKenvue Brands LLC - 25, 6.88Kenvue BrandsKinetix AG - 25, 9.84KinetixKWS Saat SE - 25, 28.24KWS Saat SE
KWS vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where KWS's grants concentrate

KWS Saat SE is a focused PatentsView assignee: 13 CPC subclasses with 72% of grants classified under A01H (NEW Plants OR ; NON-TRANSGENIC; Processes FOR Obtaining THEM; Plant Reproduction BY Tissue Culture Techniques). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (8 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2015. By volume, KWS sits between Kimura Kohki Co., Ltd. and Kinetix AG.

Who files at KWS's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows KWS holds 25 patents at rank #12,071, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near KWS

By rank, the assignees closest to #12,071 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A01H (NEW Plants OR)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in KWS's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for KWS, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A01H (NEW Plants OR), KWS ranks #40 of 285 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

KWS's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

39 Top 39% higher than 61% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0246810 20152017201820192020 7
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
KWS Saat SE patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 2 8.0%
2017 2 8.0%
2018 8 32.0%
2019 6 24.0%
2020 7 28.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

KWS Saat SE's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • KWS Saat SE's lead technology class is A01H (NEW Plants OR ; NON-TRANSGENIC; Processes FOR Obtaining THEM; Plant Reproduction BY Tissue Culture Techniques), 72% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A01H
  • Ranked #12,081 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare KWS Saat SE against Kimura Kohki Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 39.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.