Where does Kvadrat A/S rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Kvadrat A/S ranks #29,245 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Kvadrat A/S hold?

Kvadrat A/S holds 9 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2025, spanning 2 technology areas.

What is Kvadrat A/S's Innovation Score?

Kvadrat A/S has an Innovation Score of 34.5 out of 100 (48th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Kvadrat A/S focus on?

Kvadrat A/S's top technology area is B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form) with 1 patents, ranking #2,060 of 3,088 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 2 CPC subclasses total.

Is Kvadrat A/S's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Kvadrat A/S's recent grant velocity is +33% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Kvadrat A/S's patents?

Kvadrat A/S's patents average 2.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Kvadrat A/S patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Kvadrat A/S

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Kvadrat ranks #29,245 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 2 technology areas.

#29,245
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 48th percentile
by Innovation Score (34.5/100): 2.6
avg claims per patent: +33%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R29245 · Foreign Corporation #29,245 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
MID-PACK #29,245/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Kotura
CPC-NARROW B32B · 2 areas
INNOV-THIN 34.5/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 2.6 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-UP +33% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Kotura, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Kvadrat’s 34.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.0 pts (23%) Velocity 20.0 pts (58%) Breadth 5.0 pts (14%) Claim depth 1.5 pts (4%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Kvadrat A/S · this assignee

34
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Kvadrat's Innovation Score is 34.5/100 (48th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Kvadrat?

Each dot is one of Kvadrat’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Kvadrat’s own 2.6 claims/patent is at or below the 11.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Kvadrat vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Kvadrat's grants concentrate

Kvadrat A/S is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 11.1% of grants classified under B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2022. By volume, Kvadrat sits between Kotura, Inc. and L'Atelier Brands Inc..

Kvadrat's three-year grant acceleration

Kvadrat A/S shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Kotura

9
Krainz Creations

9
Kronoplus

9
Kultevat

9
Kverneland Group…

9
Kyra Medical

9
L&P Swiss Holding

9
L'atelier Brands

9
Kvadrat A/S ◀

9

What this shows Kvadrat holds 9 patents at rank #29,222, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Kvadrat

By rank, the assignees closest to #29,222 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B32B (Layered Products)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kvadrat's primary technology class.

Kvadrat's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 48th percentile higher than 48% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Kvadrat A/S patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	3	33.3%
2022	2	22.2%
2023	2	22.2%
2025partial year	2	22.2%

Which technologies does Kvadrat A/S patent most?

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 1

D06N - Wall, Floor, OR Like Covering Materials, e.g. Linoleum, Oilcloth, Artificial Leather, Roofing Felt, Consisting OF A Fibrous WEB Coated With A Layer OF Macromolecular MATERIAL; Flexible Sheet Material NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Kvadrat A/S's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Kvadrat A/S's lead technology class is B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form), 11.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B32B
Ranked #29,245 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Kvadrat A/S against Kotura, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 34.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.