Where does Krush Technologies, LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Krush Technologies, LLC ranks #32,280 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Krush Technologies, LLC hold?

Krush Technologies, LLC holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2019, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Krush Technologies, LLC's Innovation Score?

Krush Technologies, LLC has an Innovation Score of 23.5 out of 100 (12th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Krush Technologies, LLC focus on?

Krush Technologies, LLC's top technology area is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television) with 5 patents, ranking #2,173 of 5,951 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

Is Krush Technologies, LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Krush Technologies, LLC's recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Krush Technologies, LLC's patents?

Krush Technologies, LLC's patents average 11.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Krush Technologies, LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Krush Technologies, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Krush ranks #32,280 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 7 technology areas.

#32,280
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 12th percentile
by Innovation Score (23.5/100): 11.0
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R32280 · US Corporation #32,280 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #32,280/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Koolance
CPC-NARROW H04N · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 23.5/100
CLAIMS-PAR 11.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Koolance, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Krush’s 23.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (32%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 9.4 pts (40%) Claim depth 6.6 pts (28%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Krush · this assignee

24
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Krush's Innovation Score is 23.5/100 (12th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Krush?

Each dot is one of Krush’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Krush’s own 11.0 claims/patent is at or below the 13.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Krush vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Krush's grants concentrate

Krush Technologies, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 62.5% of grants classified under H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Krush sits between Koolance, Inc. and L & M Radiator, Inc..

Koolance

8
Koppert B V

8
Korea District He…

8
Kormel

8
Kunming Institute…

8
Kupa

8
Kwangjin

8
L & M Radiator

8
Krush ◀

8

What this shows Krush holds 8 patents at rank #32,277, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Krush

By rank, the assignees closest to #32,277 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04N (Pictorial Communication)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Krush's primary technology class.

Krush's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 12th percentile higher than 12% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Krush Technologies, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	4	50.0%
2018	3	37.5%
2019	1	12.5%

Which technologies does Krush Technologies, LLC patent most?

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 5

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 5

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 3

A63F - Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

G10L - Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding 3

H04M - Telephonic Communication 2

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 2

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Krush Technologies, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Krush Technologies, LLC's lead technology class is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television), 62.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04N
Ranked #32,280 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Krush Technologies, LLC against Koolance, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 23.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.